Generic Business Oriented Website

Toilet Fleet wrote:I think we need to draw a firm distinction between incidental sex and gender quality-oriented sex. A sexual act with heterosexual motivation (i.e., a state of arousal whose genesis is the qualities of the opposite gender) is arguably de facto heterosexual independent of the actual gender of the other participant(s). To put it in a different context, a male that engages in sexual activity with a sex toy shaped or otherwise engineered to have aspects of a female is inherently engaging in a heterosexual act so long as the person was aroused by the female/feminine aspects themselves or the associations drawn therein.

Based on this framework, even if one presumes that any dude knew Marissa's personal history, any sexual act would be heterosexual so long as the female/feminine aspects of Mari's personage were the primary arousing mechanisms. Similarly, if a person engages in a sexual act with Marissa but is driven by the notion that she was born male is engaging in a homosexual act independent of Marissa's sex/gender. Again, think back to the person with the sex doll. If somebody penetrates a Fleshlight with a stylistic vagina orifice, but then is imagining it in the context of a burly dude with chest hair and a penis, then it's a homosexual experience despite the arguably feminine qualities of the Fleshlight itself.

So, I think so long as you're in this 100% for the titties and how titties make you feel, then you're solely engaged in a heterosexual encounter.

I tried reverse-applying this into the Aristotelian framework and I damn near pulled a muscle.

Gunther wrote:YOUR BEARD DOESN'T HAVE A LOCK ON IT, YOU CAN EAT IT ANY TIME

Gunther wrote:YOUR BEARD DOESN'T HAVE A LOCK ON IT, YOU CAN EAT IT ANY TIME

Toilet Fleet wrote:I think we need to draw a firm distinction between incidental sex and gender quality-oriented sex. A sexual act with heterosexual motivation (i.e., a state of arousal whose genesis is the qualities of the opposite gender) is arguably de facto heterosexual independent of the actual gender of the other participant(s). To put it in a different context, a male that engages in sexual activity with a sex toy shaped or otherwise engineered to have aspects of a female is inherently engaging in a heterosexual act so long as the person was aroused by the female/feminine aspects themselves or the associations drawn therein.

Based on this framework, even if one presumes that any dude knew Marissa's personal history, any sexual act would be heterosexual so long as the female/feminine aspects of Mari's personage were the primary arousing mechanisms. Similarly, if a person engages in a sexual act with Marissa but is driven by the notion that she was born male is engaging in a homosexual act independent of Marissa's sex/gender. Again, think back to the person with the sex doll. If somebody penetrates a Fleshlight with a stylistic vagina orifice, but then is imagining it in the context of a burly dude with chest hair and a penis, then it's a homosexual experience despite the arguably feminine qualities of the Fleshlight itself.

So, I think so long as you're in this 100% for the titties and how titties make you feel, then you're solely engaged in a heterosexual encounter.

I tried reverse-applying this into the Aristotelian framework and I damn near pulled a muscle.

Gay for Cock wrote:this piece of shit thread

riley-o wrote:

Gay for Cock wrote:this piece of shit thread

why don't you go fucking suck a dick faggot

Steeb wrote:

riley-o wrote:

Gay for Cock wrote:this piece of shit thread

why don't you go fucking suck a dick faggot

That would be awesome if he went and sucked a dick.

Gay for Cock wrote:Look at Riley playing the part of the mommy who loves her precious retarded son. Nice.

a world of no wrote:i'm starting to worry about my friend kelly.