Page 4 of 6

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:02 am
by spacehamster
riley-o wrote:HURR I R MAD @ TEH INTRAWEBZ!!!!!11
Couldn't resist. Seriously, though, I'm not suddenly competing for the annoying shitbag trophy, it really does amuse and befuddle me how you guys find this so annoying that it's worth repeatedly commenting on. It's just a way to point out when I think someone's acting like a retard.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:06 am
by soiled depends
Jesus Christ Chad, this isn't the time to start talking about kikes....

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:21 am
by Chad
if ever there were a time to talk about real truth and beauty, this thread is it...because truth is forever, and it is fucking beautiful when realized...

a call to prayer in this dark Zionist world is the last wail of dying humanity against the Judaic Satanist third temple.

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK1mZs0k ... re=related<

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:53 pm
by Friendly Goatus
spacehamster wrote:
riley-o wrote:HURR I R MAD @ TEH INTRAWEBZ!!!!!11
Couldn't resist. Seriously, though, I'm not suddenly competing for the annoying shitbag trophy, it really does amuse and befuddle me how you guys find this so annoying that it's worth repeatedly commenting on. It's just a way to point out when I think someone's acting like a retard.
Spacehamster... we're not just singling something out about you in an effort to pick on you. It really is stupid and annoying and definitely above you. Fucking stop it.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:22 pm
by milkmandan
Didn't someone do this to a pic of penisnipple a few years back? heh

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:26 pm
by nomb
these are real men

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:45 pm
by Ogre of Disgust
"These people are sick! I want to light them on fire!!"

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:03 pm
by Toxicarius
Chad wrote:these people disprove the humanist proposition. that isn't to say they prove the opposite, but one thing is for sure: never trust a person. humanism posits the fundamental good of humanity...traditionalism and real life speak of a different truth, one that involves humans beyond being human.

tell me you can't see this as the ultimate (to this point) collapse of western civilization. humanism is dead but so is misanthropy...listen closely to the tradition within this, and tell me you don't feel a call to something higher than this broken, zionist, failed place

muslim call to prayer in Gaza during Israeli attack. I wasn't born a muslim but I came to tradition through other means, so you might say I submitted.

Chad wrote:if ever there were a time to talk about real truth and beauty, this thread is it...because truth is forever, and it is fucking beautiful when realized...

a call to prayer in this dark Zionist world is the last wail of dying humanity against the Judaic Satanist third temple.

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK1mZs0k ... re=related<
Archived before the inevitable ...

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:04 pm
by Necrometer
milkmandan wrote:Didn't someone do this to a pic of penisnipple a few years back? heh
cool story hansel

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:11 pm
by Hell-haine
I've browsed this site for 5 minutes and came (ho ho!) to the conclusion that:
A lot of these posts are fake. Like this "daughter" whose dad has pictures of her sucking multiple dicks.
Then there are scorned suitors looking for a way to humiliate the "bitches" who rejected them. (or want to fuck their buddy's wife/sister/aunt)
Those who probably never talked to a girl irl.
Some fetishists, who are usually harmless and whose biggest offense is stealing panties and bras to cum on.
And some perverts who fantasize about underage girls in their family and share it with a bunch of other pervs.

That's this last category that I'm concerned about.
The rest are just harmless idiots.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:14 pm
by Kurt Russell's Beard
Hell-haine wrote:I've browsed this site for 5 minutes and came (ho ho!) to the conclusion that:
A lot of these posts are fake. Like this "daughter" whose dad has pictures of her sucking multiple dicks.
Then there are scorned suitors looking for a way to humiliate the "bitches" who rejected them. (or want to fuck their buddy's wife/sister/aunt)
Those who probably never talked to a girl irl.
Some fetishists, who are usually harmless and whose biggest offense is stealing panties and bras to cum on.
And some perverts who fantasize about underage girls in their family and share it with a bunch of other pervs.

That's this last category that I'm concerned about.
The rest are just harmless idiots.
So you think the fathers who are cumming on their daughters' panties are fake?

And how can you even be around dicks ever again when you see this sort of thing?

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:27 pm
by Kurt Russell's Beard
sgnrvlnd wrote:Because women can be just as perverted as men? Come on, haven't you ever seen The Piano Teacher?
Oh yeah. Great movie.

So you're saying Helene is a perv?

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:30 pm
by Hell-haine
Kurt Russell's Beard wrote:
Hell-haine wrote:I
So you think the fathers who are cumming on their daughters' panties are fake?

And how can you even be around dicks ever again when you see this sort of thing?
Yes for example, I'm 100% sure this one is fake:
http://cumonprintedpics.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9622
What father owns porn pictures of his daughter?
Looks like shameless porn starlet promo to me.

How can I be around dicks ever again?
Haha, I've been hanging out with boys since I realized I loved playing with trucks as much as playing with dolls.
Then soccer, martial arts, metal bands were my activities from 10 to 25 so I'm very aware of what males are capable of.
There's not much that surprises me anymore, I think it started with my best friend fucking a tomato when I was 12...

And yes indeed, women can be as bad when it comes to sexuality and its "boundaries"
SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW
even with fruit and vegetables :awesome:

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:34 pm
by Kurt Russell's Beard
Hell-haine wrote:
Kurt Russell's Beard wrote:
Hell-haine wrote:I
So you think the fathers who are cumming on their daughters' panties are fake?

And how can you even be around dicks ever again when you see this sort of thing?
Yes for example, I'm 100% sure this one is fake:
http://cumonprintedpics.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9622
What father owns porn pictures of his daughter?
Looks like shameless porn starlet promo to me.

How can I be around dicks ever again?
Haha, I've been hanging out with boys since I realized I loved playing with trucks as much as playing with dolls.
Then soccer, martial arts, metal bands were my activities from 10 to 25 so I'm very aware of what males are capable of.
There's not much that surprises me anymore, I think it started with my best friend fucking a tomato when I was 12...

And yes indeed, women can be as bad when it comes to sexuality and its "boundaries"
The father in that example is just posting pics of his daughter in that top post. Other posters are 'shopping her face onto porno women. Looks real to me (not that the daughter is actually doing porno, but that the father is posting her normal pics wanting to see other men cum on her photos).

A tomato? Your friend was a boy or a girl?

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:39 pm
by Hell-haine
I don't know, I don't buy it... Who knows I might be wrong.
And shame on me for not noticing the photoshop!!!

Yes, a boy.
Boys were always the worst with their cum obsession too, like jerking off into a kleenex then tossing it into the teacher's briefcase, things like that. And I went to catholic school...

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:42 pm
by Gunther
oh man this reminds me of what happened to that penisnipple picture if you guys remember

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:51 pm
by Kurt Russell's Beard
Hell-haine wrote:I don't know, I don't buy it... Who knows I might be wrong.
And shame on me for not noticing the photoshop!!!

Yes, a boy.
Boys were always the worst with their cum obsession too, like jerking off into a kleenex then tossing it into the teacher's briefcase, things like that. And I went to catholic school...
You have no idea what it's like to have this stuff shoot out of you. It's hard not to be obsessed.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:53 pm
by Tony Twist
I need a release. I need something to cum on. ANYTHING.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:57 pm
by Gunther
Tony Twist wrote:I need a release. I need something to cum on. ANYTHING.
Image

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:57 pm
by Kurt Russell's Beard
Aaaah, just typing the word makes me need to shoot it out of me, ugh, I'm gonna drip it into this empty beer bottle because it's the closest thing to me.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:03 pm
by IFryKids
You mean to tell me that these xasthur fans don't even have the dignity to cum on a single teddy bear? Fucking pathetic.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:05 pm
by Tony Twist
Gunther wrote:
Tony Twist wrote:I need a release. I need something to cum on. ANYTHING.
Image
That whale is about to become the most literate version of a sperm whale to ever exist. Imagine if it wore panties, I'd cream the shit out of those.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:08 pm
by Tony Twist
eh_d wrote:that's a fucking baleen whale retard
I never said it was a sperm whale, I said I was going to make it one.

SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW
Retard.

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:10 pm
by Tony Twist
eh_d wrote:whatever dude go and jack off onto a picture of a whale
Atta boy. :lhug:

Re: Cum on Printed Pics

Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:14 pm
by james
eh_d wrote:that's a fucking baleen whale retard
HAHAHHAHA