Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:29 pm
Generic Business Oriented Website
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
http://www.reeelapse.com/
COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Page 5 of 7
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:58 pm
noah thirteen wrote:I remember really liking this album half a lifetime ago, now it just sounds like fucking garbage....Necrometer wrote:
No way that cover was ever better than the Germs though
Also, FUCK THIS. Need To Control is the pinnacle. It's self-evident that only assholes don't recognize this.soiled depends wrote:def. their worst record.....
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:32 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:13 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:16 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:19 pm
I don't like Krallice and the Orphan stuff I've heard has been pretty boring, but I'm really digging the Krallice covers e.p.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:27 pm
Tony Twist wrote:
absolutely not. you must be fucking crazy.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:32 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:42 pm
You know, looking back, I'm not sure why I posted that. It's a pretty awesome cover but the original is pretty stellar.the motherfucking d-i-e wrote:Tony Twist wrote:
absolutely not. you must be fucking crazy.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:46 pm
In the end, it's still the gay side of metal.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 12:10 am
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:45 am
Tony Twist wrote:You know, looking back, I'm not sure why I posted that. It's a pretty awesome cover but the original is pretty stellar.the motherfucking d-i-e wrote:Tony Twist wrote:
absolutely not. you must be fucking crazy.
that is not just one of my favorite helloween songs, it's one of my favorite songs in general.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 11:39 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 11:49 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:55 pm
Better than the Shuggie Otis version in my opinion, but I love both.
And yeah, probably no one will agree with me on this one, but:
Again, I love both versions.
And yeah, probably no one will agree with me on this one, but:
Again, I love both versions.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 6:03 pm
That's right, I went there...
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:14 pm
hammerfall singer is no michael kiske. good range but not anywhere near as musical.
otherwise cover is by the numbers but the drums on the original aren't sterile triggered crap.
otherwise cover is by the numbers but the drums on the original aren't sterile triggered crap.
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:56 am
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:01 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:11 pm
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:33 pm
No fucking way. The original's nothing special, but this is terrible.d.hellion wrote:
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:09 am
I'd say Death To Music's cover of Nighstick's "Workers Of The World Unite" but they are both equally awesome.
Also I'm sure I'll get lynched for this but...
Also I'm sure I'll get lynched for this but...
SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:22 am
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:03 am
Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:29 am
I can't believe I forgot about this one. One of my favorites.wONKO the sane wrote: