Page 3 of 7

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:09 am
by Toxicarius
Ragnarok (UK) covering Manowar's Heart of Steel:


Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:15 am
by The Seventh Son
Image

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:26 pm
by From Blintzes to Crepes


Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:46 pm
by Tony Twist
I love the originals so much but these are close calls:




And while I'm on FNM ................



Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:52 pm
by hipster holocaust
Tony Twist wrote:I love the originals so much but these are close calls:

I remember BUNGVOX posting a pretty jaw dropping performance of Melvins doing ITV live

THOU do an alright cover of Born Against's "Well Fed Fuck"

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:15 pm
by Natas
Okay. So I try not to be the guy who gets appaled by stuff but I can not ignore this any more. I mean guns of Brixton? The Clash? London Calling? Helloooooo

Motorhead? Pink Floyd? Lay Lady Lay?? Devo?

and the wosrt of them all: HOW CAN YOU SAY ANY COVER VERSION OF DANCING QUEEN IS BETTER THAN ONE OF THE GREATEST SONGS EVER RECORDED

sorry carry on. I guess I very rarely like covers better than originals

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:31 pm
by Mari_Mar
necrothrash wrote:Sorry, Tom.

YES!!! Totally agree!

Also:


Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:47 pm
by Iron Goldie
Natas wrote:sorry carry on. I guess I very rarely like covers better than originals
I agree. There's maybe two songs in this thread that actually trump the original. There are plenty of covers I'd consider almost as good, or equal (like Eddie Hazel's or George Benson's cover of California Dreamin') but a cover that beats the original is rare indeed.

I guess we'll forever be the naysayers here...

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:53 pm
by Idget Child
hipster holocaust wrote:
The Real MPD wrote:
pfffft no frickin way
Pretty much why I decided to post, too. This is so off the fucking mark.
riley-o wrote:
More like this.
From Blintzes to Crepes wrote:
And this!


Maybe add this (even though I still love RP to death):

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:57 pm
by nick

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:09 pm
by Necrometer

Stabbable Corpse wrote:pretty much every slayer cover ever is better than the original slayer version.
I was shocked that no one's called me out for the initial vid (Vader's Silent Scream) and I am ultra shocked at this shit. Either you hate Slayer or you haven't heard enough covers... there's some real bullshit out there. I don't think any Hell Awaits cover is better than the original, as was suggested above. Well... there might be one exception:
SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW

ITS A JOKE
Idget Child wrote:
hipster holocaust wrote:
The Real MPD wrote:
pfffft no frickin way
Pretty much why I decided to post, too. This is so off the fucking mark.
I just heard both for the first time... it's a draw! Nirvana one just sounds like generic Nirvana. Wipers one could sound like generic Wipers... fuck if I know!

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:13 pm
by soiled depends
def. their worst record.....

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:14 pm
by Necrometer
the underground? you guys can keep it

hahaha, see my awesome edit up above - nice sync there

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:26 pm
by Gay for Cock
Toxicarius wrote:

The fuck is wrong with you? :drool:

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:44 pm
by ThePhillyExperiment


Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:46 pm
by The Real MPD

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:36 pm
by The Seventh Son

I don't think this is BETTER than the original, but a lot of killer Slayer covers have been posted and this one shouldn't be overlooked


Also, all covers by Judas Priest except for Johnny B. Goode.
SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:54 pm
by Tony Twist


Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:02 am
by abdominalpillaging
i love both versions, but brodequin's cover is just so much tighter all around.



Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:04 am
by Tony Twist
I almost posted that one.

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:05 am
by abdominalpillaging
Tony Twist wrote:I almost posted that one.
well i'm glad you didn't because that's literally the only one i could think of.


besides this i guess....

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:22 am
by gustavprom

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:46 am
by From Blintzes to Crepes

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:27 am
by Geeheeb
katatonia cover of jeff buckley totally sucks compared to original. boooooo.

Re: COVER > ORIGINAL thread [naysayers welcome]

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:04 am
by d.hellion