Page 5 of 6

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 7:39 pm
by cxwx

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2018 8:22 pm
by Glub
MeatGrease wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:38 am
Cascade Whore wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bil ... D=ref_fark

:lol: Fuck this piece of shit fucking country.
I would not hesitate to run over any wild chimps (or you) trying to block the road and ruin my shit. You take the bus to your telemarketing job so obviously you can't relate to having your property damaged or being endangered, but laws like these probably benefit these retards more than anyone else as maybe now they will think twice about doing something so dangerous and shitty.
You'd do no such thing, pussy.
You don't have the goddamned heart to do any such thing and every person here is well aware of it.
And the only reason you care about your "shit" getting ruined is that, when you're forced to work menial and embarrassing jobs all of your life (due to laziness, lack of talent, stupidity), you can't just shrug it off if your things get ruined like many of us here can.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 7:58 pm
by Black Jacques
Cascade Whore wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:02 pm
Cascade Whore wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:54 am How about we change the subject to nuclear waste for awhile

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/fpl-w ... er-9059210

So according to john Iadarola (take that for what you will) he plugged in some numbers on into a model that predict global warming and even the most conservative projections you can enter show this site being underwater with in 75 years.
An aquifer will be underwater in 75yrs, water brain?

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:32 pm
by cxwx
Black Jacques wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 7:58 pm
Cascade Whore wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:02 pm
Cascade Whore wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:54 am How about we change the subject to nuclear waste for awhile

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/fpl-w ... er-9059210

So according to john Iadarola (take that for what you will) he plugged in some numbers on into a model that predict global warming and even the most conservative projections you can enter show this site being underwater with in 75 years.
An aquifer will be underwater in 75yrs, water brain?
It’s been awhile since the original story came out but I am pretty sure the point was the nuclear waste intermingling with drinking water due to flooding caused by climate change and it being dangerously close to the water supply.

Like, I get it, aquifers are under water you obtuse cocksucker.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:38 pm
by Black Jacques
So in 75yrs flooding will cause the aquifer to be, like, more under water due to climate change?

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:40 pm
by Black Jacques
Update on Standing Rock while i’ve got you https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... -of-office
" 'We kind of neglected our own' by taking the lead on the pipeline protest, he said. 'We did what we had to do, but we didn't realize we were going to hurt our economy that much.'
"The state shut down the highway near the protest camp for months. The highway also was the main route for patrons of the tribe's casino, its main source of revenue.
" 'People want to see how we can fix ourselves,' Faith said. 'We have to look at not depending on the casino so much. We have to look at enticing companies to come down here.' "

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:43 pm
by Black Jacques
Might get a feel for the Band’s priorities here
https://www.bia.gov/sites/bia.gov/files ... Nation.pdf

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:46 pm
by cxwx
Black Jacques wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:40 pm Update on Standing Rock while i’ve got you https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... -of-office
" 'We kind of neglected our own' by taking the lead on the pipeline protest, he said. 'We did what we had to do, but we didn't realize we were going to hurt our economy that much.'
"The state shut down the highway near the protest camp for months. The highway also was the main route for patrons of the tribe's casino, its main source of revenue.
" 'People want to see how we can fix ourselves,' Faith said. 'We have to look at not depending on the casino so much. We have to look at enticing companies to come down here.' "
Hey that’s great. There is still a whole link about an oil leak being twice as large as it was claimed to be for you to continue to ignore.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:48 pm
by MeatGrease
:lol: :lol: :lol: my sides, oh my poor little sides

Hey, cascade whore...

















WATER IS WET

"Nuh uh!"

:lol:

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:51 pm
by Black Jacques
Well clearly, from the mouths of FN themselves, the only people who care about these sorts of things are basement dwelling liberals on either coast.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:57 pm
by cxwx
Black Jacques wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:51 pm Well clearly, from the mouths of FN themselves, the only people who care about these sorts of things are basement dwelling liberals on either coast.
Not sure who FN is. I’m not on the coast and I don’t have a basement, although that would be pretty cool. The link was from Reuters. Here it is again.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tran ... SKBN1HE0T7

If you find something inaccurate or misleading about it, please, de-water my brain. After all, you’re the expert. Maybe you should move to the states and work for CPV, they are really good at bribing our politicians and I’m sure the ethics standards are much lower comparatively to Canada. You can make even more money.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:57 pm
by cxwx
MeatGrease wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:48 pm :lol: :lol: :lol: my sides, oh my poor little sides

Hey, cascade whore...

















WATER IS WET

"Nuh uh!"

:lol:
Shut the fuck up for once, adults are talking.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:16 pm
by Black Jacques
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:57 pm
Black Jacques wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:51 pm Well clearly, from the mouths of FN themselves, the only people who care about these sorts of things are basement dwelling liberals on either coast.
Not sure who FN is. I’m not on the coast and I don’t have a basement, although that would be pretty cool. The link was from Reuters. Here it is again.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tran ... SKBN1HE0T7

If you find something inaccurate or misleading about it, please, de-water my brain. After all, you’re the expert. Maybe you should move to the states and work for CPV, they are really good at bribing our politicians and I’m sure the ethics standards are much lower comparatively to Canada. You can make even more money.
First Nations. It’s like when ultra-progressive people use “African American” instead of the N word. You’ll get here eventually cw.

I’m not interested in dewatering your brain or defending a specific oil spill - I’ve never said they won’t happen or that they aren’t a terrible thing. I have said hat I think the risks are overplayed and environmental impacts overstated all the while the socio-economic benefits are understated. And so far, it looks like the people most-affected - less than a year after the fact here - agree.

Re. Your spill... I hope Trans Canada stepped up to the plate and has started or finished cleaning up the spill and appropriately reimbursed/compensated the affected landowner - if thats not happening i’m not going to defend it.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:39 pm
by cxwx
Black Jacques wrote:
First Nations. It’s like when ultra-progressive people use “African American” instead of the N word. You’ll get here eventually cw.
Sure okay. Not really sure why this is entering the conversation. You are the one making this about PC fag SJW use of language, not me. And you have shown to have been really touchy on the issue of native Americans. That’s your bag man. I think they get a raw deal but I am more concerned about not breathing sludge.

I have said hat I think the risks are overplayed and environmental impacts overstated all the while the socio-economic benefits are understated.
sorry, I can not reconcile this with an industry that routinely lies through its fucking teeth and was proven by internal memos to have known of the affects of green house gas since the late 70s and their response was how much money would it cost to bury the information instead of helping to make a safer product. If anything the effects of environmental damage are far worse due to the skewing of public information through the millions spent on lobbying and rightwing think tanks and useful idiot conspiracy theory pieces of human waste. We will forever be diametrically opposed to each other on the fundamental principles of the argument.
Re. Your spill... I hope Trans Canada stepped up to the plate and has started or finished cleaning up the spill and appropriately reimbursed/compensated the affected landowner - if thats not happening i’m not going to defend it.
That’s good. Because I really do want to believe you are not a worthless fucking shill. I couldn’t be happier to be shown to be completely full of shit. Being right here leads us to a very bleak place.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:07 am
by Toilet Fleet
"state power was exercised to the detriment of people trying to assert their rights" sure is the best argument for [checks notes] legislative capture by the oil industry

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 3:33 pm
by Glub
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:57 pm
MeatGrease wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:48 pm :lol: :lol: :lol: my sides, oh my poor little sides

Hey, cascade whore...

















WATER IS WET

"Nuh uh!"

:lol:
Shut the fuck up for once, adults are talking.
It's like a bunch of 20-somethings are talking at a cocktail party, but one of them got stuck with their teenaged special needs sibling who somehow pestered his way into tagging along. You're all talking about mortgages and starting families, but Tardy McAutist keeps interrupting to tell you about video games.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:07 pm
by MeatGrease
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:39 pm. We will forever be diametrically opposed to each other on the fundamental principles of the argument.
Listen here you bloated, bloviating, bitch. The only thing you two are "diametrically opposed" on is raw IQ.

Fucking hell man. Even the wildest savage stalking the Savannah plains could fucking tell you that water itself, get this, is already underwater

"In 75 years, water will be underground!!! And then what will we do?!?!! Aha, drumphtards destroyed!"

Holy fuck man, that's good. That's reeeeal good 8)

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:15 pm
by cxwx
MeatGrease wrote: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:07 pm
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:39 pm. We will forever be diametrically opposed to each other on the fundamental principles of the argument.
Listen here you bloated, bloviating, bitch. The only thing you two are "diametrically opposed" on is raw IQ.

Fucking hell man. Even the wildest savage stalking the Savannah plains could fucking tell you that water itself, get this, is already underwater

"In 75 years, water will be underground!!! And then what will we do?!?!! Aha, drumphtards destroyed!"

Holy fuck man, that's good. That's reeeeal good 8)
You are a monumental fucking retard.

There are TWO aquifers. They are dumping nuclear waste into the one UNDER the one that is filled with drinking water and claiming that it is completely safe and the one filled with waste is “hermetically sealed” and couldn’t possibly leak even though it is in an area that has tectonic shifts and......FLOODING, which contribute to leaks.... and the the lower one is under more hydrostatic pressure causing upwards ejection of materials.

You forced me to dig up a young Turks video so I can hate myself




You didn’t read the article. You have no idea what the fuck you are talking about. You latched onto a quip made by someone to win some stupid brownie points in the pathetic hope that SOMEONE might think you are not a gigantic pile of rotting piss.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:21 pm
by Necrometer
First Nations. It’s like when ultra-progressive people use “African American” instead of the N word.
I think FN is more like PoC, and "Native American" = "African American", while "injun" or "redskin" is closest to "nigger"

this all reminds me of my highschool social studies book that said the current PC term for endogenous people was "amerind" - something I committed to memory and subesequently heard used about zero times

I think "native", prevalent in canada, is my favorite
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:39 pmYou are the one making this about PC fag SJW use of language, not me.
Another time out might be due...

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:26 pm
by cxwx
You already said that Ross

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:45 pm
by Glub
MeatGrease wrote: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:07 pm
cxwx wrote: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:39 pm. We will forever be diametrically opposed to each other on the fundamental principles of the argument.
Listen here you bloated, bloviating, bitch. The only thing you two are "diametrically opposed" on is raw IQ.

Fucking hell man. Even the wildest savage stalking the Savannah plains could fucking tell you that water itself, get this, is already underwater

"In 75 years, water will be underground!!! And then what will we do?!?!! Aha, drumphtards destroyed!"

Holy fuck man, that's good. That's reeeeal good 8)
Hey, Shitdick, understand this: the only one who gets called a bitch here is you, bitch.

"Raw IQ."
You ditch-digging motherfucker. What kind of "raw IQ" can an absolute failure like you possibly have?

Everything about you is weak and feminine.

Accept that and respect that.

The best you can hope for in this world is pity.
The quicker you come to terms withthat, the better off you'll be.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:11 pm
by cxwx
I really want to hear meatgrease talk more about fossil fuel consumption, climate change and mans role in impacting the environment. He has already established himself to be an expert on geopolitics, socioeconomics, race relations, and human sexuality so of course such a gifted autodidact, such a renaissance man would also have a solid grip on the hard sciences.


Oh I almost forgot! He is also smarter than our resident lawyer, teachers and chemist.

Please carry professor grease, I’m listening

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 6:01 am
by Glub
cxwx wrote: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:11 pm I really want to hear meatgrease talk more about fossil fuel consumption, climate change and mans role in impacting the environment. He has already established himself to be an expert on geopolitics, socioeconomics, race relations, and human sexuality so of course such a gifted autodidact, such a renaissance man would also have a solid grip on the hard sciences.


Oh I almost forgot! He is also smarter than our resident lawyer, teachers and chemist.

Please carry professor grease, I’m listening
The only scenario where I'd want to hear from that human* colostomy bag is if he's talking to us from beyond the grave.

* I'm being generous here.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 11:12 am
by hipster holocaust
Pretty sure our collective heaven would be his ghost attempting to haunt whatever miserable place he grew up in Jersey for the rest of eternity, and still having people laughing at him.

Re: Dakota access pipeline

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 11:33 am
by Glub
hipster holocaust wrote: Mon Apr 16, 2018 11:12 am Pretty sure our collective heaven would be his ghost attempting to haunt whatever miserable place he grew up in Jersey for the rest of eternity, and still having people laughing at him.
I don't give out hugs often, but...