Generic Business Oriented Website

spacehamster wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:31 am

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 8:38 am You on the other hand, are the real dangerous radical extremist, since you believe in a completely unrestricted right to eat doo-doo from men's butts regardless of the negative externalities for the rest of society.

For the benefit of the brainwashed ZOG slaves in the audience, could you please elaborate on what these negative externalities for the rest of society are? I long to be red pilled.

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:41 am Meatlease you do realize that the majority of the media you consume (music, books, art ) would generally be considered degenerate and get you shoved into a gas chamber yourself in your Uber utopia? Or are you the one who gets to define what moral code is considered valid in the brave new world? Considering how malleable fascism is, it can be what ever it needs to me. What ever you do assuming your aren’t being facetious please try to get your book published by Black Ice or Creation Books, I really really really want your manifesto to be along side of Peter Sotos and Samuel Delaneys Hogg.

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:11 pm I’m no autodidact expert like you but I’m fairly certain that the clinical data shows that the vast vast majority of child molesters, even those of young boys are essentially heterosexual men.

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:11 pm child molesters, even those of young boys

are essentially heterosexual men.

What mainstream publisher do you think would publish your book, you don’t realize how delusional that sounds?

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:08 pm


It's not as far fetched as you think it is. There's nothing controversial in the book at all. It's merely a meta analysis of the current cutting edge research on human biodiversity applied to natural law. That's it. It's nothing like a manifesto. The most controversial thing about it is that it was written outside of Academia.

Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:48 pm autodidact

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:11 pm I’m no autodidact

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:08 pm
It doesn't take an autodidact expert to

MeatGrease wrote:

meta analysis of the current cutting edge research on human biodiversity applied to natural law.

Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:57 pm

Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:48 pm autodidact

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 12:11 pm I’m no autodidact

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:08 pm
It doesn't take an autodidact expert to

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:00 pm
There’s absolutely no way what so ever that this is something you are actually doing. Not even the most remote chance that this is a true statement.

Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the Indo-Europeans. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-Indo-European Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification 'white' out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the Indo-European expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the Indo-European's, and Anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples - are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not Indo-Europeans.


Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics least so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians) we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 8:47 pm

cxwx wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 6:00 pm
There’s absolutely no way what so ever that this is something you are actually doing. Not even the most remote chance that this is a true statement.

Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the Indo-Europeans. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-Indo-European Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification 'white' out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the Indo-European expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the Indo-European's, and Anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples - are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not Indo-Europeans.


Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics least so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians) we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.

Now say something, bitch.

FVBTVS wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:13 pmsciatica

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 9:21 pmMorons

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 9:21 pmMorons

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 8:47 pm

Now say something, bitch.