random youtube thread

[Tony Twist]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RPZYv9-oKs<

[The Torsion]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWY1Ai9wsqs<

Shuck & Jive : Master Debaters

My Apologize

[Wormholegenerator]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_peUxE_BKcU<

[Cascade Whore]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RPZYv9-oKs<

[bland ed]

i'm so glad that happened at the end

[Necrometer]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWY1Ai9wsqs<

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFbQftMe6qY<
check out ~2:02

asdfkjgawerfkluawefluabwf UH afaeukrfaerukthathb UH aserjteilargsdfjhabermjh UH UH UH aserkluahleriabdsfakjbv UH tywsaerguahweraunr [thumps interspersed]

also 2:30

[Necrometer]

what is this horseshit anyway

watch for a minute at 10:00, 20:00, 35:00, 51:00
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya6g36Co5ck<

I'm actually angry right now

[Necrometer]

these people's mouths are to english as dave mustaine's guitar is to vivaldi

[valgalder]

What the FUCK is this shit?

[Cascade Whore]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate

Style and delivery

Speed

Policy debaters' speed of delivery will vary from league to league and tournament to tournament. The debaters who speak most quickly speak at rates of 350[7] to in excess of 500 words per minute.[8] In many tournaments, debaters will speak very quickly in order to read as much evidence and make as many arguments as possible within the time-constrained speech. Speed reading is referred to as spreading. At the majority of national circuit policy debate tournaments, spreading is the norm.

Some feel that the rapid-fire delivery makes debate harder to understand for the lay person.[9] Rapid delivery is encouraged by those who believe that increased quantity and diversity of argumentation makes debates more educational. Others, citing scientific studies, claim that learning to speak faster also increases short- and long-term memory. A slower style is preferred by those who want debates to be understandable to lay people and those who claim that the pedagogical purpose of the activity is to train rhetorical skills. Many further claim that the increased speed encourages debaters to make several poor arguments, as opposed to a few high-quality ones. Most debaters will vary their rate of delivery depending upon the judge's preferences.

Many judges are willing to prompt debaters by yelling "clear!" or variants when they can no longer understand because the speed has become too great or because the debater is enunciating poorly.

[FVBTVS]

yeah

[Cascade Whore]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btjYXua-06I<
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4lobns6ZG8<

[The Torsion]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate

Style and delivery

Speed

Policy debaters' speed of delivery will vary from league to league and tournament to tournament. The debaters who speak most quickly speak at rates of 350[7] to in excess of 500 words per minute.[8] In many tournaments, debaters will speak very quickly in order to read as much evidence and make as many arguments as possible within the time-constrained speech. Speed reading is referred to as spreading. At the majority of national circuit policy debate tournaments, spreading is the norm.

Some feel that the rapid-fire delivery makes debate harder to understand for the lay person.[9] Rapid delivery is encouraged by those who believe that increased quantity and diversity of argumentation makes debates more educational. Others, citing scientific studies, claim that learning to speak faster also increases short- and long-term memory. A slower style is preferred by those who want debates to be understandable to lay people and those who claim that the pedagogical purpose of the activity is to train rhetorical skills. Many further claim that the increased speed encourages debaters to make several poor arguments, as opposed to a few high-quality ones. Most debaters will vary their rate of delivery depending upon the judge's preferences.

Many judges are willing to prompt debaters by yelling "clear!" or variants when they can no longer understand because the speed has become too great or because the debater is enunciating poorly.

Mup da doo didda po mo gub bidda be dat tum muhfugen bix nood cof bin dub ho muhfugga.

[BUNGVOX]

what is this horseshit anyway

watch for a minute at 10:00, 20:00, 35:00, 51:00
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya6g36Co5ck<

I'm actually angry right now

i like how they're set up on a card table like they're doing a noise show.

fucking idiotic.

[Necrometer]

this garbage might fare better if it were assessed as a noise show, actually

[BUNGVOX]

this garbage might fare better if it were assessed as a noise show, actually

depends on their pedal set up and contact mic placement.

[Necrometer]

I thought the scene mandated anal placement exclusively post-9/11

[Black Jacques]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU9u9Jb36AU<

[featherboa]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZbciVwQ ... be&t=1m15s<

ffwd to like 1:15

[elephants gerald]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Trx6imNU6-o<

[Cascade Whore]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXmr_weg2ao<

[Eight Foot Manchild]

I made my own 'SHREDS' video, ala StSanders...
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X16tHhLYWzE<

[copstache]

[Cascade Whore]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p69e5Cd ... hVhQSCjTyw<

[Cascade Whore]

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-VXwfGGsd4<