Generic Business Oriented Website

Oh, I agree 100%, but if you read my posts in this thread I don't really have a dog in the fat-shaming fight.

I wasn't even talking about fat activists. Purely on a visceral level, fat women are more revolting. Nothing will change that.

The Torsion wrote:Purely on a visceral level, fat women are more revolting. Nothing will change that.

culture and era clearly change that

Nobody was jerking off to Venus of Willendorf or Rubens. Everyone knows what a healthy woman is built like.

The Torsion wrote:Nobody was jerking off to Venus of Willendorf or Rubens.

rule 34

Don't know don't care

it's prison code for 'sissy communist mcnugget combo'

The Torsion wrote:Don't know don't care

ahhhh, the ancient mantra of the moron.

Congratulations guys, you have dumfucc on your side

The Torsion wrote:Congratulations guys, you have dumfucc on your side

if the foe feature works correctly then, well, i'm pretty sure that they don't know and don't care......

riley-o wrote:It's not exclusively about either gender, but without a doubt the vast majority of loud annoying fat activists are women. That can hardly be a surprise, though, when beauty standards are basically a rule for women and little more than a cereal box serving suggestion for men.

Yes, men are visual. It's not fair to fat women. I suppose something must be done.

Let's do something!!!

Geeheeb wrote:i have met my share of offensive fat men though...

I'm sorry. I'm still trying to keep myself in better shape these days....

Did that fat just say fats don't interfere with anyone's life but their own?

Let's make it crystal fucking clear that I am never, ever on the side of 1. fats, or 2. dummfoc.

Posted this with Ross in mind. Ross, apparently fats have found the world is unpredictable and science is thus pointless.

Have the fats found free energy?!

Zap Rowsdower wrote:

Posted this with Ross in mind. Ross, apparently fats have found the world is unpredictable and science is thus pointless.

There is one valid observation in the graphic. CI/CO does not work consistently due to the way the various macronutrients trigger endocrine response (i.e., isocaloric quantities of carbohydrates and fats have completely different impacts on hormonal response, and by extension, impact on body composition).
HOWEVER, based on the fact that the USDA recommendations for dietary intake guidelines assume CI/CO is true, this person will more likely than not continue to consume massive quantities of "whole grains" and "complex carbohydrates" (read: sugar) just like the "low-fat" Healthy Choice box told her, develop diabetes type-II, and then be a customer-for-life for a drug company that manufactures insulin for diabetics, and drugs to treat the other side effects of the condition.

Zap Rowsdower wrote:

ahahhaa

she deserves to suffer that shit. delusional insanity!

Looks like someone is dying alone.

takeasneededforpain wrote:

Zap Rowsdower wrote:

SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW

Posted this with Ross in mind. Ross, apparently fats have found the world is unpredictable and science is thus pointless.

There is one valid observation in the graphic. CI/CO does not work consistently due to the way the various macronutrients trigger endocrine response (i.e., isocaloric quantities of carbohydrates and fats have completely different impacts on hormonal response, and by extension, impact on body composition).
HOWEVER, based on the fact that the USDA recommendations for dietary intake guidelines assume CI/CO is true, this person will more likely than not continue to consume massive quantities of "whole grains" and "complex carbohydrates" (read: sugar) just like the "low-fat" Healthy Choice box told her, develop diabetes type-II, and then be a customer-for-life for a drug company that manufactures insulin for diabetics, and drugs to treat the other side effects of the condition.

yeah, I am pretty anti-CI/CO, so that thing is not the most offensive rant out there

http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-st ... -no,32770/

“Going to the gym is a waste of time if you are doing it to lose weight,” said University of California physiologist Dr. Andrew Novak, adding that time working out would be better spent reading, spending time with your family, sleeping, watching television, or eating. “Now, if you are exercising to prevent heart disease or cancer, well, new evidence has come to light that exercise actually doesn’t help fend off any sort of debilitating illness. In fact, it never has, and the only thing that can help you avoid terminal diseases is pure, blind fate.”

“Sorry,” he added.

konfirmed