Generic Business Oriented Website

Geeheeb wrote:I smell my own BO. Its really hot here in the box office.

Necrometer wrote:

Necrometer wrote:LOL @ gun/arm mushing on the mech:

they totally fixed this in the new trailer, BTW

In fact that whole shot is remarkably different, they fixed the lighting and everything so it looks gritty instead of shiny and shitty

Also, more ripoff alert: http://io9.com/5390226/did-james-camero ... ns-novella

Necrometer wrote:I lack those skills, and the real thing will be out tomorrow, so it's really not worth the bother.

Necrometer wrote: This movie is such a fucking sci-fantasy wet dream for me... I might have to do some drugs again the first time I see it. I still haven't seen Titanic and am wondering if I should do so just to calibrate my douchexpectations.

MANTIS wrote:

Necrometer wrote: This movie is such a fucking sci-fantasy wet dream for me... I might have to do some drugs again the first time I see it. I still haven't seen Titanic and am wondering if I should do so just to calibrate my douchexpectations.

You're on the edge Ross.

THE EDGE.

Parachute wrote:It's got CCH Pounder from The Shield!

MANTIS wrote:Drugs? Titanic?

The EDGE man.

The movie is 161 minutes and flies by in a rush. Repeat business? You bet. “Titanic”-level business? That level may never be reached again, but Fox will see more than enough grosses worldwide to cover its bet on Cameron.

But let’s cut to the chase: A fully believable, flesh-and-blood (albeit not human flesh and blood) romance is the beating heart of “Avatar.” Cameron has never made a movie just to show off visual pyrotechnics: Every bit of technology in “Avatar” serves the greater purpose of a deeply felt love story.

As with everything in “Avatar,” Cameron has coolly thought things through. With every visual tool he can muster, he takes viewers through the battle like a master tactician, demonstrating how every turn in the fight, every valiant death or cowardly act, changes its course. The screen is alive with more action and the soundtrack pops with more robust music than any dozen sci-fi shoot-’em-ups you care to mention…

In years of development and four years of production no detail in the pic is unimportant. Cameron’s collaborators excel beginning with the actors. Whether in human shape or as natives, they all bring terrific vitality to their roles.

Mauro Fiore’s cinematography is dazzling as it melts all the visual elements into a science-fiction whole. You believe in Pandora. Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg’s design brings Cameron’s screenplay to life with disarming ease.

James Horner’s score never intrudes but subtlety eggs the action on while the editing attributed to Cameron, Stephen Rivkin and John Refoua maintains a breathless pace that exhilarates rather than fatigues. Not a minute is wasted; there is no down time.

The only question is: How will Cameron ever top this?

It’s been twelve years since Titanic, but the King of the World has returned with a flawed but fantastic tour de force that, taken on its merits as a film, especially in two dimensions, warrants four stars. However, if you can wrap a pair of 3D glasses round your peepers, this becomes a transcendent, full-on five-star experience that's the closest we'll ever come to setting foot on a strange new world. Just don’t leave it so long next time, eh, Jim?

suteli-bunn wrote:holy shit... a love story? can't miss!

delmuerte wrote:Okay, so...is this like the unofficial World Of Warcraft movie or something? What's the big deal?

Sineadrepresent wrote:Jesus, nothing about this looks even remotely watchable.

The reviews that were posted on RT don't really make it sound like a good film as much as an exercise in new technology and therefor not proper reviews in a cinematic sense. I'd say that's a bad sign.