Generic Business Oriented Website

OK James, you had your thread your way and it ended up being pretty stupid

Now I will speak

First of all I put to you a very simple, straightforward, and honest question. I intentionally phrased it in as layman's as terms can be. I still don't know why Ross thought I was trying to go over anyone's head or whatever

Let's make this perfectly clear: I am head and shoulders above you all in reading level

Now, since you gave enough of a shit to make an annoying thread about this stuff, you should know that there's a lot of things you have gotten totally, totally wrong, and now I'm going to set the record straight

Eight Bit Alien wrote:Natural, strong, well-groomed man doesn't want his women to breed with inferior stock

The jew introduces vice and degenerates his heart

The degenerate man has sexual fantasies about his woman breeding with black guys, and his children are fathered by other men; "my wifes son!"


Important to note that I think for a lot of these guys, this is all a bit of a metaphor - the real danger is just the cultural exchange of power, which is very handily illustrated by pornography depicting male-POV submission.

Uhh, ok. I can't prove to you that someone doesn't think this, only that no one actually thinks this? It's just an insult dude. It's another way of calling someone a faggit. Your weird psychoanalyzing just comes across like some smelly autistic youtuber waxing rhapsodic about "the psychology of feminism!!1" Your team, in other words.

I think generally the idea is that the jew is a dracula-type foreigner who already has control over lots of the lesser races; he wants to lessen the power of white men, and thin out the white race so that it will become impossible to ever fight back.

No. The Jew appears as a doppelganger of the white race. An unseen being that goes around breaking windows and starting fires, to the chagrin of the innocent, who is unable to convince the village that it was another, unable to tell them apart. Everything that is leveraged against whites regarding supremacy and privilege is actually and only true of the Jews: aggressively ethnocentric, culpable for a litany of historical grievances (slavery is an excellent example of this), and unequivocally dominant in all institutions of power despite being an impossibly small minority. Read any Huffington Post article written by a white person about white privilege. I promise you, I fucking PROMISE you they are 99/100 times Jewish. This shifting of the spotlight onto another while ACTUALLY doing what they accuse another of is exactly why they are invariably Shoah'd every time they are discovered throughout historical time.

A lot of these guys also think that we're headed towards white extinction, which is bad; if people generally think "It doesn't matter what race you are; it doesn't matter if my children are white!" because they are cucks, then they will never even have the desire to secure future full of healthy white babies.

What do you think the quality of life is going to be for whites when they are a minority in a nation of ethnic hostiles? Do you know what life is like for whites in south africa & zimbabwe? You are completely OK with there being almost no English people in England? At a certain point you just have to admit to yourself that you are a morally vacuous, deracinated, atomized nothing, with no past or future.

You CANNOT make this stuff up dude!!!!

Harvard Prof Urges Liberals to Treat Evangelical Christians Like Nazis
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ike-nazis/

reading level just made me genuinely spit take

Speak of the devil...

yep. anywhere there's a twerp millennial that'll believe in absolutely anything I'll be there..

MeatGrease wrote:Let's make this perfectly clear: I am head and shoulders above you all in reading level

even proofreading?

I intentionally phrased it in as layman's as terms can be.

MeatGrease wrote: Let's make this perfectly clear: I am head and shoulders above you all in reading level

No doubts about that bud!

YOUR THESIS INSULT IS ABOUT LITERACY
YOU MANGLED THE SYNTAX
INSIDE OF THAT STATEMENT

Are they saying the jew is a vampire

No you atomized nothing he's A TRICKY GHOST

Eight Bit Alien wrote: Are they saying the jew is a vampire

No you atomized nothing he's A TRICKY GHOST

MeatGrease wrote:Let's make this perfectly clear: I am head and shoulders above you all in reading level

MeatGrease wrote:like some smelly autistic youtuber waxing rhapsodic about "the psychology of feminism!!1" Your team, in other words.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT

IM SO GOOD AT READIN

HERE LET ME MISUSE LIKE 12 IDIOMS IN A ROW

a

Eight Bit Alien wrote:

Bolognagrease wrote:
Laymens terms

My reading level

Breitbart

Hmm...OK I think I know where I went wrong now: I'm still pitching fastball here. Still, it's kind of strange to me how it's been lost on so many of you that what I wrote is in fact grammatically consistent. The linguistic precision of one that is well versed in dialectics is such that certain phrasings might appear broken or indecipherable to the uninitiated. Sorry but this level of acumen is not easily turned off. I could digress upon this further but I really don't want to get all Wittgenstein on you all. For one it would be tedious, and while the tedium of things is usually my area of interest, obviously it would be lost on you all.

Now, on to the heart of the matter: let's say hypothetically I'm guilty of a blunder. To exaggerate an innocuous gaffe in order to avoid addressing the actual substance of an argument seems to be in bad faith. In essence, an argumentum ad absurdum reductio.

You're OK with that?

YOU are the one that used argumentative smoke screens instead of delivering a rebuttal against james

"yeah those people exist but mostly not"

how about you explain why jews would invent IR/cuck porn, if james is off the mark

fukn dummy

They didn't. The "Jews are causing western civ to degenerate" is 2nd gen shit. The narrative is now that whites are committing racial suicide due to a convergence of circumstances. Jews are simply a group with interests, like any other, who at once profit from white displacement while simultaneously competing for control of the gun which is the state. Of course most producers and consumers of this shit are whites themselves. No one can actually put anything into your mind: they can only set the parameters within which you interact with the world around you. To believe otherwise would lend credence to The Blank Slate.

FacileGrease wrote: I'm still pitching fastball here. The linguistic precision of one that is well versed in dialectics is such that certain phrasings might appear broken or indecipherable to the uninitiated. Sorry but this level of acumen is not easily turned off. I could digress upon this further but I really don't want to get all Wittgenstein on you all. For one it would be tedious, and while the tedium of things is usually my area of interest, obviously it would be lost on you all.

Now, on to the heart of the matter: let's say hypothetically I'm guilty of a blunder. To exaggerate an innocuous gaffe in order to avoid addressing the actual substance of an argument seems to be in bad faith. In essence, an argumentum ad absurdum reductio.

Eight Bit Alien wrote:Not here to trash your beliefs at all, or you Meatgrease. Just exlopring an internet subculture i've become fascinated with. This is sorta what i do.

All due respect, hope you dont find this too triggering

Quoting this just to drive home the point - I didn't make this thread to shit on you lil homie. I know I wiled out on you in that other thread but this whole thing wasn't to trash you personally, I'm just interested in anime nazis and the fact that white nationalism of all things seems to be on the rise.

You can freak out and call me mean names and stuff if you want, I don't really care

MeatGrease wrote:

SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW

Hmm...OK I think I know where I went wrong now: I'm still pitching fastball here. Still, it's kind of strange to me how it's been lost on so many of you that what I wrote is in fact grammatically consistent. The linguistic precision of one that is well versed in dialectics is such that certain phrasings might appear broken or indecipherable to the uninitiated. Sorry but this level of acumen is not easily turned off. I could digress upon this further but I really don't want to get all Wittgenstein on you all. For one it would be tedious, and while the tedium of things is usually my area of interest, obviously it would be lost on you all.

Now, on to the heart of the matter: let's say hypothetically I'm guilty of a blunder. To exaggerate an innocuous gaffe in order to avoid addressing the actual substance of an argument seems to be in bad faith. In essence, an argumentum ad absurdum reductio.

You're OK with that?

Also before we move on I need to know if this post is 100% earnest or if you went overly verbose to be funny

MeatGrease wrote:I could digress upon this further but I really don't want to get all Winter Light on you all.

You already did, dude. You already did.

Yeah bro I don't mean to get all Wittgenstein on you but that's not what "digress" means either

Theres only one answer