Re: Latest book you read (1-10 scale)
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:56 am
“Swing Time”- Zadie Smith 7.5/10
Crime And Punishment- 10/10
Crime And Punishment- 10/10
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
http://www.reeelapse.com/
id like to know more
I kind of pegged you for a “Garfield Sucks His Own Cock” kinda guy.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:26 pm
10/10. As if we needed any more proof of the biological veracity of classical racial categories, this is the final nail in the coffin of the jewish post modern "blank slate" lie.
i grew up in south florida. down here, more than the bush era neocon bullshit, the popularity of nu metal as a cultural force is what really prepared me mentally for people like youMeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:26 pm
10/10. As if we needed any more proof of the biological veracity of classical racial categories, this is the final nail in the coffin of the jewish post modern "blank slate" lie.
I know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you the fuck out too bad, first of all the enlightenment was a huge mistake. Secondly tabula rasa was dead after Darwin, everyone who follows this stuff knows that I'm referring to second wave, Gouldian, jewish post marxist destruction of scientific anthropology, which was replaced with the BS we have now.Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:14 pm tabula rasa thought-thread is aristotle -> aquinas -> enlightenment
what a bunch of kikes
No matter who you're talking to or what you're talking about on here, you do not know more than any of us about anything, you community college attending, manual labor performing trash.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pmI know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you.Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:14 pm tabula rasa thought-thread is aristotle -> aquinas -> enlightenment
what a bunch of kikes
Double post directed at a single loser.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pmI know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you.Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 2:14 pm tabula rasa thought-thread is aristotle -> aquinas -> enlightenment
what a bunch of kikes
You absolutely don't. You obviously don't have a background in philosophy at all - you haven't had an education or guided experience, and you aren't an autodidact. You're not stupid, but most of what you know clearly comes from cursory internet browsing.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pm I know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you the fuck out too bad, first of all the enlightenment was a huge mistake. Secondly tabula rasa was dead after Darwin, everyone who follows this stuff knows that I'm referring to second wave, Gouldian, jewish post marxist destruction of scientific anthropology, which was replaced with the BS we have now.
Nothing but ad homsEight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:48 pmYou absolutely don't. You obviously don't have a background in philosophy at all - you haven't had an education or guided experience, and you aren't an autodidact. You're not stupid, but most of what you know clearly comes from cursory internet browsing.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pm I know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you the fuck out too bad, first of all the enlightenment was a huge mistake. Secondly tabula rasa was dead after Darwin, everyone who follows this stuff knows that I'm referring to second wave, Gouldian, jewish post marxist destruction of scientific anthropology, which was replaced with the BS we have now.
You'll have a bunch of excuses as to why this is the case, and the ways in which your approach would be superior, but these are lies. Something about the university system or your teachers being flawed. You have a mental genealogy of names and ideas, but most of these are things you got from propaganda-sources or popular science communicators, which leave you anemic and visibly underdeveloped.
Again I don't think you're a dumb dude, but you haven't put the work in - you should stop pretending that you have, because that won't fix your problems.
If you ever wanted to have a discussion about any of this you should PM me, I'd absolutely put in the time.
The work you do?MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:54 pmNothing but ad homsEight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:48 pmYou absolutely don't. You obviously don't have a background in philosophy at all - you haven't had an education or guided experience, and you aren't an autodidact. You're not stupid, but most of what you know clearly comes from cursory internet browsing.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pm I know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you the fuck out too bad, first of all the enlightenment was a huge mistake. Secondly tabula rasa was dead after Darwin, everyone who follows this stuff knows that I'm referring to second wave, Gouldian, jewish post marxist destruction of scientific anthropology, which was replaced with the BS we have now.
You'll have a bunch of excuses as to why this is the case, and the ways in which your approach would be superior, but these are lies. Something about the university system or your teachers being flawed. You have a mental genealogy of names and ideas, but most of these are things you got from propaganda-sources or popular science communicators, which leave you anemic and visibly underdeveloped.
Again I don't think you're a dumb dude, but you haven't put the work in - you should stop pretending that you have, because that won't fix your problems.
If you ever wanted to have a discussion about any of this you should PM me, I'd absolutely put in the time.
If you have a real critique I'd be happy to explain whatever to you but otherwise don't waste my time because I'm serious about the work I do
Stop giving this dork the benefit of the doubt; he's absolutely dumber than a second coat of paint. Sadly, through the miracle of 4chan/reddit, kids who would have respectfully listened to "shut it, dummy" a decade or so ago now have online support groups reassuring them "academia/your employers/people doing better than you just can't recognize how brilliant you are (despite your complete lack of accomplishments and qualifications.)"Eight Bit Alien wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:48 pmYou absolutely don't. You obviously don't have a background in philosophy at all - you haven't had an education or guided experience, and you aren't an autodidact. You're not stupid, but most of what you know clearly comes from cursory internet browsing.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Sun Feb 16, 2020 3:24 pm I know way, way, way more about this topic than you, so quickly without blowing you the fuck out too bad, first of all the enlightenment was a huge mistake. Secondly tabula rasa was dead after Darwin, everyone who follows this stuff knows that I'm referring to second wave, Gouldian, jewish post marxist destruction of scientific anthropology, which was replaced with the BS we have now.
You'll have a bunch of excuses as to why this is the case, and the ways in which your approach would be superior, but these are lies. Something about the university system or your teachers being flawed. You have a mental genealogy of names and ideas, but most of these are things you got from propaganda-sources or popular science communicators, which leave you anemic and visibly underdeveloped.
Again I don't think you're a dumb dude, but you haven't put the work in - you should stop pretending that you have, because that won't fix your problems.
If you ever wanted to have a discussion about any of this you should PM me, I'd absolutely put in the time.