Re: James Cameron's AVATAR - you know... for kids!
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:36 pm
Almighty mother of god...
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
http://www.reeelapse.com/
It's not an easy subject to bring up. That and about 70 people saw it I think.Necrometer wrote: Synechdoche is top-notch, and people pretty much never talk about it
I don't have a favorite one, there's a bunch of movies I've enjoyed, this one wasn't among them.Necrometer wrote:To my favorite of the decade? What's yours?jefferson wrote:
did you even watch the vid?TheDOAD wrote:Jesus Christ you fat stupid fuck.ThE GodDamN BattletweeteR wrote:....holy fuck on a stick.
avatar geeks may surpass starwar geeks for faggotree.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yk2vR8w2 ... r_embedded<
the guy at teh very end makes it worth it.TheDOAD wrote:Just about enough to realize it was a horribly made Comedy parody. I'm sure you knew that though. Did you watch it?
Eh, it's not that bad but it's one of James Cameron's worst films. "Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie. Transformers with a healthy coat of shiny new paint. With that said, if I was 12 I would have loved the shit out of this.chris narcosis wrote:Worst movie of all time bar none.
Really? I find CGI-heavy movies like this usually age really badly. The LotR movies have gotten to that point now where I can't watch them anymore without noticing something wrong with the CGI all the time. That's part of the reason why I'm not interested in Avatar. Ten years from now, this movie will look laughably bad.Deez Nutz wrote:eye-candy like that has infinite replay value.
if you see the trailer for toy story 3 then go and look at toy story 1 its so different and dated almost.spacehamster wrote:Really? I find CGI-heavy movies like this usually age really badly. The LotR movies have gotten to that point now where I can't watch them anymore without noticing something wrong with the CGI all the time. That's part of the reason why I'm not interested in Avatar. Ten years from now, this movie will look laughably bad.Deez Nutz wrote:eye-candy like that has infinite replay value.
Wang Mandu wrote:Eh, it's not that bad but it's one of James Cameron's worst films. "Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie. Transformers with a healthy coat of shiny new paint. With that said, if I was 12 I would have loved the shit out of this.chris narcosis wrote:Worst movie of all time bar none.
$60chris narcosis wrote:Wang Mandu wrote:Eh, it's not that bad but it's one of James Cameron's worst films. "Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie. Transformers with a healthy coat of shiny new paint. With that said, if I was 12 I would have loved the shit out of this.chris narcosis wrote:Worst movie of all time bar none.
I honestly think it`s the shittest movie I`ve seen other than Nightbeast. Nightbeast is at least funny though. I wouldn`t watch Avatar again for anything less that $100
Dr Yail Bloor wrote:$60chris narcosis wrote:Wang Mandu wrote:Eh, it's not that bad but it's one of James Cameron's worst films. "Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie. Transformers with a healthy coat of shiny new paint. With that said, if I was 12 I would have loved the shit out of this.chris narcosis wrote:Worst movie of all time bar none.
I honestly think it`s the shittest movie I`ve seen other than Nightbeast. Nightbeast is at least funny though. I wouldn`t watch Avatar again for anything less that $100
But you could buy books for that....chris narcosis wrote:Dr Yail Bloor wrote:$60chris narcosis wrote:Wang Mandu wrote:Eh, it's not that bad but it's one of James Cameron's worst films. "Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie. Transformers with a healthy coat of shiny new paint. With that said, if I was 12 I would have loved the shit out of this.chris narcosis wrote:Worst movie of all time bar none.
I honestly think it`s the shittest movie I`ve seen other than Nightbeast. Nightbeast is at least funny though. I wouldn`t watch Avatar again for anything less that $100
NO DEAL!!
This is so far from true. The G.I.Joe movie cost $175 million and was shit visually. You think another $125 M would have fixed that? Cameron can do something no one else can. Even the LOTR movies look fucking retarded post-Avatar. I tried. It's just hippies walking through fields the whole time.Wang Mandu wrote:"Bbbbut it looks amazing." Give a guy $300 million and just about anyone can make a great looking movie.
In the end of the Battle of Pelennor Fields the ghosts are swarming the elephants and are moving faster than all of the rest of the CGI. It was obviously a mistake and I'm amazed it got through. But yeah, there are lots of other examples. At this point I can only watch the first movie without laughing.spacehamster wrote: Really? I find CGI-heavy movies like this usually age really badly. The LotR movies have gotten to that point now where I can't watch them anymore without noticing something wrong with the CGI all the time. That's part of the reason why I'm not interested in Avatar. Ten years from now, this movie will look laughably bad.