it's not surprising that you're incredibly bad at reading statistics, but the claim that trump is separating families at the border—which they are, as a stated policy that has been confirmed again and again—is not itself disproven by the existence of other kids that came without parents and thus weren't separated from their already-absent families. the one is not dependent on the other for validity: the separation policy would be a thing whether there were zero or 100,000 unaccompanied minors also in the custody of the insane nationalist alphabet soup system currently in placeMeatGrease wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:39 amWell given the fact that when pathological liars like yourself continue to say "Trump is separating families at the border!!!!11" is wrong 83% of the time, I have to wonder at what point you'd be willing to say "OK, maybe it's not happening after all". 90%? 99%? If it had only ever happened once in the history of this administration, you'd still think it's honest to characterize the situation as "separating families at the border" ?Toilet Fleet wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:12 am loving the hooting dipshit parroting a "well, 10,000 out of 12,000 came here alone, so that's okay" talking point, completely sidestepping the whole voluntary vs. under color of state violence question
Why are you such a piece of shit?
this is part of why people laugh at you, because you're so impossibly inept at getting the interrelationship (calm down, that word is not a portmanteau of interracial relationship) of discrete facts right. take these two assertions, made before any data is collected:
1. every time tom sees a red mailbox, he will fuck it
2. tom will fuck no other mailboxes
if tom walked past 1.8 trillion non-red mailboxes and did not fuck them, and only 32 red mailboxes but fucked all them, that is actually a confirmation of the first assertion, independent of the ratio of fucked to non-fucked mailboxes
be like tom: get out of the house and go fuck a mailbox