Re: European Mens, what's the migrant crisis look like from where you are?
Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 1:58 pm
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
http://www.reeelapse.com/
I wish I could share your optimism.... still fucktons of right-wing assholes around. The fact that they haven't yet seized control in the Netherlands or France doesn't make all of them go away or become irrelevant.spacehamster wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2017 12:29 pm ...annnnd the Front National loses so badly that they're probably going to change their name.
I'm starting to think we should thank the US for Trump winning the election (and the Brexit voters) because they seem to have shocked everyone else out of their stupor. First Wilders, now Le Pen. This is awesome.
Sure. But I think people have stopped "protest voting" for candidates they don't actually want to see elected or ideas they don't actually want implemented because they've remembered how voting works. That doesn't mean these shitheels are completely disappearing, but if they're not winning elections, I don't mind that they exist. Racism exists, so someone's going to say this stuff. The important thing is that they don't actually get to make policy.
I think they snuck into the country to live like worthless parasites.spacehamster wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2017 3:09 pm I think he's saying they intentionally snuck into the country at some point in the last century to fuck and make a baby that would blow up a bunch of teenagers.
Won't someone PLEASE think of the terrorists!hipster holocaust wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2017 7:46 am Don't worry bud, his dad and brother are in police custody now, probably being tortured.
When are the victims of terror ever not oven middle class shitlibs? And regardless of who those targets might be, I'm always on the side of the Mohammedans, because their jihad and ours is actually the same. They always attack what they consider to be exemplars of western culture: commercialist, semi-pornographic spectacles celebrating the induction of young people into a vapid, decadent way of life completely divorced from any sense of decency or responsibility. These are not things worth defending from my point of view, and Islam has already changed western attitudes towards homosexuality and feminism for example, as now both of those agendas are subordinate to Sharia. Overall, the trend of Islam's increasingly aggressive jihad against neoliberal democratic values and Anglo-Judea's geopolitical/military hegemony is waking more and more of our people up to the reality of what has happened to them. I am against Muslim immigration simply because they are our racial enemies.hipster holocaust wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2017 1:21 pm If there was a terrorist attack in your town, and almost all of the victims were a bunch of PC punx and bleeding hearts, which side would you pick?
Is this the Venn diagram of intersectional balloon headism? That's a rhetorical question.MeatGrease wrote: ↑Thu May 25, 2017 2:26 pm , I'm always on the side of the Mohammedans, because their jihad and ours is actually the same........
I am against Muslim immigration simply because they are our racial enemies.
Oh, I know I'm just pointing out the obvious, it's just funny to me because it's so obvious. Fascism needs an outside threat, preferably one that can be defined in ethnic terms, to "rally the people" against, and it's difficult to argue that such a threat exists if "the people" are white Westerners, i.e. the most privileged ethnic group in the world. So obviously the images of white people being blown up by brown people from the Middle East (or anything and everything that can somehow be defined as such) makes someone like MG jizz his pants. Finally we're the victims.Toilet Fleet wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:30 am you don't need to be a psychologist to see just how much of clash-of-cultures fanaticism is extroverted self-hate; they relish in the suffering of "betters" and the inferiority of the perpetrators because it lowers everybody in their eyes, making their own miserable existence seem that much more justifiable if just barely
Yes, anyone concerned about non-stop terrorism and murder is just suffering from a case of Freudian penis inadequacyToilet Fleet wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:30 am you don't need to be a psychologist to see just how much of clash-of-cultures fanaticism is extroverted self-hate; they relish in the suffering of "betters" and the inferiority of the perpetrators because it lowers everybody in their eyes, making their own miserable existence seem that much more justifiable if just barely
spacehamster wrote: i.e. the most privileged ethnic group in the world.
What is the fucking point of "Fascism" if removing browns is just an excuse, a pretense, as you claim? What in your shriveled brain do you think is the real objective of rejecting mass immigration? Power for the sake of power?? Inflicting misery and oppression just for fun??spacehamster wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:04 amOh, I know I'm just pointing out the obvious, it's just funny to me because it's so obvious. Fascism needs an outside threat, preferably one that can be defined in ethnic terms, to "rally the people" against, and it's difficult to argue that such a threat exists if "the people" are white Westerners, i.e. the most privileged ethnic group in the world. So obviously the images of white people being blown up by brown people from the Middle East (or anything and everything that can somehow be defined as such) makes someone like MG jizz his pants. Finally we're the victims.Toilet Fleet wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:30 am you don't need to be a psychologist to see just how much of clash-of-cultures fanaticism is extroverted self-hate; they relish in the suffering of "betters" and the inferiority of the perpetrators because it lowers everybody in their eyes, making their own miserable existence seem that much more justifiable if just barely