Generic Business Oriented Website

You know, it's tricky. I have found just one little problem with your Scientific Treatise on the Sexual Origins of Political Archetypes. B-but I'm sure I'm just having trouble understanding this rigorous and complex theory of mind. Perhaps you may shed more of your light on this topic, professor:

If hysterical superstitions common amongst the fascist-christian extremist right in this country, such as the belief in biological sexes for example, are the result of a repressed penis envy due to never having had sex ever in life (not even once), which we understand empirically thanks to technologically sophisticated methods such as Freudian Psychoanalysis, and so logically concluding that anyone with a leftist dispensation must be getting a metric fuckton of primo snatch around the clock, non-stop, since all political opinions exist on a range of those belonging to beta-virgins (100% of drumpf supporters), to those of cunt-tycoons (enlightened bernie ppl )....

...then why is the sexless loser cascade whore so adamantly against me? Since he has probably never had sex in his life, or if he has it was at least a lifetime ago (a hundred pounds ago?) , then according to your theory, he should be 100% aligned with my politics.



So what gives, teach?

you've gotta give me something to work with...

Now what are you babbling about again...

THE KILL wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:12 am Now what are you babbling about again...

It's just a long winded shot he's taking at Cascade Whore.

ITT: a dullard not understanding the notion of "necessary but not sufficient"

You may want to hang it up when even the people seemingly and somewhat "aligned with your politics" (Chad) think you're a complete blowhard

hipster holocaust wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2017 2:10 pm You may want to hang it up when even the people seemingly and somewhat "aligned with your politics" (Chad) think you're a complete blowhard

Eh? Chad? I don't see any similarity between my views and his I'm afraid. Guy was beating his chest over him being a bigger hater of Jews than I. Good for him but I have nothing to do with hate, and I certainly wouldn't make it into some stupid little contest. I am interested in epistemic and scientific truths, and problem solving. That's it.

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:44 pmepistemic ... truths

I, on the other hand, am interested in the scientific sciences

science qua science-ing

I've been reading a lot lately about 1939-1945 era World War II

I am interested in culinary breakfasts, and problem solving. That's it.

oh boy, another one of these threads

itt: dullards who don't understand precision within logical sets

can't believe Ross has a ph.d

I've got my work cut out for me

Explain to me the lure of kikes

MeatGrease wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:51 pm itt: dullards

Only one, really..

r/redpillepistemology

riley-o wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:55 pmI've been reading a lot lately about 1939-1945 era World War II

not many realize that while it was happening, they didn't call it WWII, but "the greater war"

It also helps mentioning if the author(s) were axis or allies

I had sex on Friday. She choked me while spitting in my face. I really enjoyed it. I'm a highly immoral person. I'm sure Ben Shapiro would be disgusted.

ben shapiro, after climbing onto a scissor lift, would still avoid eye contact and say he "respects differing moralities in a constitutional republic"

So the narrative of "I'm not racist" racists has been that the media routinely ignores when blacks assault whites. Maybe lovegrease can tell me why there's been very little coverage of the attempt by a what appears to be a white supremacist to blow up an airport or otherwise cause destructive mayhem in North Carolina

http://www.citizen-times.com/story/news ... 749394001/