Page 51 of 56

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:49 am
by cxwx
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/exces ... e_vignette

Is this 44% increase found to be linked to vaccines or to the negative effects that Covid-19 itself has on the cardiovascular system?

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 3:26 pm
by Eight Bit Alien
Image

Everybody help!

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 3:52 pm
by featherboa
carrying goalposts

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:32 pm
by Brutus Frank
cxwx wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:49 am https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/exces ... e_vignette

Is this 44% increase found to be linked to vaccines or to the negative effects that Covid-19 itself has on the cardiovascular system?
You can't ask that question unless you link to GOOD GUY SOURCES, which is the opposite of this:

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ ... nto-humans

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:38 pm
by Brutus Frank
Toilet Fleet wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 10:29 am Just for shits and giggles, let's all read the actual research paper (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.230743) and not a review/comment, which sets this nice digestible nugget up for certain board members that have a long history of being fucking retarded:
Asymptomatic patients who underwent PET/CT 1-180 days after their second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed increased myocardial Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on images compared to nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged >180 days after vaccination did not.
Cool, so you ONLY have to deal with 6 months of myocarditis

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:41 pm
by cxwx
Brutus Frank wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:32 pm
cxwx wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:49 am https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/exces ... e_vignette

Is this 44% increase found to be linked to vaccines or to the negative effects that Covid-19 itself has on the cardiovascular system?
You can't ask that question unless you link to GOOD GUY SOURCES, which is the opposite of this:

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ ... nto-humans
I'm fine with nanoprobes if I get to mind meld with Seven Of Nine.

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:39 am
by Hunter
Brutus Frank wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:32 pm
cxwx wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:49 am https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/exces ... e_vignette

Is this 44% increase found to be linked to vaccines or to the negative effects that Covid-19 itself has on the cardiovascular system?
You can't ask that question unless you link to GOOD GUY SOURCES, which is the opposite of this:

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ ... nto-humans
Hey Zero Head, if you took a half a second to be critical of where you source this dumb shit, you might only come across as a half head and save everyone the two minutes it takes to debunk it. The worst part about retiree-facebook-brain-worm-syndrome is the compulsion to share the psychotic links uncritically, as if you're trying to do a public service. I'm honestly surprised you haven't posted about the Emergency Broadcast System test over 5g tomorrow that will activate the Marburg virus in vaccinated people.

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:47 am
by Eight Bit Alien
China activated the virus

5g just makes you gay

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:48 am
by Eight Bit Alien
Thats why gay people look at their phones all the time.

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:55 am
by Brutus Frank
Hunter wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 6:39 am
Brutus Frank wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:32 pm
cxwx wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:49 am https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/exces ... e_vignette

Is this 44% increase found to be linked to vaccines or to the negative effects that Covid-19 itself has on the cardiovascular system?
You can't ask that question unless you link to GOOD GUY SOURCES, which is the opposite of this:

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ ... nto-humans
Hey Zero Head, if you took a half a second to be critical of where you source this dumb shit, you might only come across as a half head and save everyone the two minutes it takes to debunk it. The worst part about retiree-facebook-brain-worm-syndrome is the compulsion to share the psychotic links uncritically, as if you're trying to do a public service. I'm honestly surprised you haven't posted about the Emergency Broadcast System test over 5g tomorrow that will activate the Marburg virus in vaccinated people.
🕜🕡🕦🕣
🕥🕧🕔🕕
🕖🕗🕘🕙
🕚🕛🕝🕞
🕟🕠🕢🕤

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 7:55 am
by Toilet Fleet
Brutus Frank wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:38 pm
Toilet Fleet wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 10:29 am Just for shits and giggles, let's all read the actual research paper (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.230743) and not a review/comment, which sets this nice digestible nugget up for certain board members that have a long history of being fucking retarded:
Asymptomatic patients who underwent PET/CT 1-180 days after their second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination showed increased myocardial Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on images compared to nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged >180 days after vaccination did not.
Cool, so you ONLY have to deal with 6 months of myocarditis
Potentially six months of asymptomatic (!) myocarditis versus that pesky lil 5G bioweapon that killed 1.1 million people in the U.S.

Add "risk management" to the list of things Dummfucc can't do

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 8:11 am
by Eight Bit Alien
The myocarditis is safe and effective.

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 8:58 am
by Toilet Fleet
The jab has a risk of side effects that can only be detected by radiotracing

As a gun owner, I find that degree of risk simply unacceptable

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:15 am
by Brutus Frank
Toilet Fleet wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 8:58 am The jab has a risk of side effects that can only be detected by radiotracing

As a gun owner, I find that degree of risk simply unacceptable

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:27 am
by Toilet Fleet
That you posted a clip that explicitly leaves out its resolution—and where the resolution is precisely about framing samples outside of their greater statistical context to mislead about the probabilities therein—is the dummfucciest response to your dummfuccing possible

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:33 am
by Brutus Frank
Toilet Fleet wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:27 am That you posted a clip that explicitly leaves out its resolution—and where the resolution is precisely about framing samples outside of their greater statistical context to mislead about the probabilities therein—is the dummfucciest response to your dummfuccing possible
And yet he flipped it 10x in a row

How many chambers in the cylinder before you are willing to make Russian roulette mandated so as to assuage your worries and feelings?

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:03 am
by featherboa
are we arguing about math or mandating things?

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:04 am
by Brutus Frank
featherboa wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:03 am are we arguing about math or mandating things?
Same thing when the justification for the mandate is "it probably won't hurt you" while failing to prevent transmission, like every vaccine in known history until 2021

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:40 am
by Toilet Fleet
Brutus Frank wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:33 am
Toilet Fleet wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 9:27 am That you posted a clip that explicitly leaves out its resolution—and where the resolution is precisely about framing samples outside of their greater statistical context to mislead about the probabilities therein—is the dummfucciest response to your dummfuccing possible
And yet he flipped it 10x in a row

How many chambers in the cylinder before you are willing to make Russian roulette mandated so as to assuage your worries and feelings?

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:44 am
by featherboa
paging spacehamster

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:45 am
by Hunter
Can you imagine how angry this guy would be if testing alternatives weren't ever an option?

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 11:16 am
by Eight Bit Alien
featherboa wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:03 am are we arguing about math or mandating things?
Definitely mandating for me
Also censoring & psyopping

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:02 pm
by spacehamster
featherboa wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:44 am paging spacehamster
No thanks.

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 12:39 pm
by featherboa
haha

Re: James answers your coronavirus questions thread

Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2023 1:34 pm
by FVBTVS
craziest thing about simfoc's endless genetic need to get his head repeatedly flushed down the toilet is that even awesome assassin has been secretly posting some pretty good music lately