Page 218 of 237

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:51 pm
by Tony Twist

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:39 pm
by The Torsion
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWY1Ai9wsqs<

Shuck & Jive : Master Debaters

My Apologize

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:25 pm
by Wormholegenerator

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:11 am
by Cascade Whore

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:50 pm
by bland ed
i'm so glad that happened at the end

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:35 pm
by Necrometer
:theylive:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFbQftMe6qY<
check out ~2:02

asdfkjgawerfkluawefluabwf UH afaeukrfaerukthathb UH aserjteilargsdfjhabermjh UH UH UH aserkluahleriabdsfakjbv UH tywsaerguahweraunr [thumps interspersed]

also 2:30

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:41 pm
by Necrometer
what is this horseshit anyway

watch for a minute at 10:00, 20:00, 35:00, 51:00
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya6g36Co5ck<

I'm actually angry right now

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:49 pm
by Necrometer
these people's mouths are to english as dave mustaine's guitar is to vivaldi

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 11:55 pm
by valgalder
What the FUCK is this shit?

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:46 am
by Cascade Whore
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate
Style and delivery

Speed

Policy debaters' speed of delivery will vary from league to league and tournament to tournament. The debaters who speak most quickly speak at rates of 350[7] to in excess of 500 words per minute.[8] In many tournaments, debaters will speak very quickly in order to read as much evidence and make as many arguments as possible within the time-constrained speech. Speed reading is referred to as spreading. At the majority of national circuit policy debate tournaments, spreading is the norm.

Some feel that the rapid-fire delivery makes debate harder to understand for the lay person.[9] Rapid delivery is encouraged by those who believe that increased quantity and diversity of argumentation makes debates more educational. Others, citing scientific studies, claim that learning to speak faster also increases short- and long-term memory. A slower style is preferred by those who want debates to be understandable to lay people and those who claim that the pedagogical purpose of the activity is to train rhetorical skills. Many further claim that the increased speed encourages debaters to make several poor arguments, as opposed to a few high-quality ones. Most debaters will vary their rate of delivery depending upon the judge's preferences.

Many judges are willing to prompt debaters by yelling "clear!" or variants when they can no longer understand because the speed has become too great or because the debater is enunciating poorly.

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:32 am
by FVBTVS
yeah :awesome:

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:21 pm
by Cascade Whore

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:27 pm
by The Torsion
Cascade Whore wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate
Style and delivery

Speed

Policy debaters' speed of delivery will vary from league to league and tournament to tournament. The debaters who speak most quickly speak at rates of 350[7] to in excess of 500 words per minute.[8] In many tournaments, debaters will speak very quickly in order to read as much evidence and make as many arguments as possible within the time-constrained speech. Speed reading is referred to as spreading. At the majority of national circuit policy debate tournaments, spreading is the norm.

Some feel that the rapid-fire delivery makes debate harder to understand for the lay person.[9] Rapid delivery is encouraged by those who believe that increased quantity and diversity of argumentation makes debates more educational. Others, citing scientific studies, claim that learning to speak faster also increases short- and long-term memory. A slower style is preferred by those who want debates to be understandable to lay people and those who claim that the pedagogical purpose of the activity is to train rhetorical skills. Many further claim that the increased speed encourages debaters to make several poor arguments, as opposed to a few high-quality ones. Most debaters will vary their rate of delivery depending upon the judge's preferences.

Many judges are willing to prompt debaters by yelling "clear!" or variants when they can no longer understand because the speed has become too great or because the debater is enunciating poorly.
Mup da doo didda po mo gub bidda be dat tum muhfugen bix nood cof bin dub ho muhfugga.

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:41 pm
by BUNGVOX
Necrometer wrote:what is this horseshit anyway

watch for a minute at 10:00, 20:00, 35:00, 51:00
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya6g36Co5ck<

I'm actually angry right now
i like how they're set up on a card table like they're doing a noise show.

fucking idiotic.

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:14 pm
by Necrometer
this garbage might fare better if it were assessed as a noise show, actually

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:29 pm
by BUNGVOX
Necrometer wrote:this garbage might fare better if it were assessed as a noise show, actually
depends on their pedal set up and contact mic placement.

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 2:30 pm
by Necrometer
I thought the scene mandated anal placement exclusively post-9/11

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:04 pm
by Black Jacques

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:11 pm
by featherboa

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:17 pm
by elephants gerald

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:50 am
by Cascade Whore

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 11:29 am
by Eight Foot Manchild
I made my own 'SHREDS' video, ala StSanders...
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X16tHhLYWzE<

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Sat May 03, 2014 12:09 pm
by copstache
:fonz:

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 5:43 pm
by Cascade Whore

Re: random youtube thread

Posted: Fri May 09, 2014 12:19 am
by Cascade Whore