copstache wrote:
Takin me out of context... my Aronofsky apprish is well-documentedMANTIS wrote:Why would anyone give money to Darren Aronofsky to make a Noah film that was faithful to the Bible? How could you possibly expect that result?
copstache wrote:
Takin me out of context... my Aronofsky apprish is well-documentedMANTIS wrote:Why would anyone give money to Darren Aronofsky to make a Noah film that was faithful to the Bible? How could you possibly expect that result?
Conversely, though, why would Aronofsky sign on to do a big-budget bible movie and expect to have free rein? This just had trainwreck written all over it from the start. In theory, I can actually see how you could interpret Noah as an Aronofsky character - driven/obsessive to the point of self-destruction and all that - but there's just too much obvious red tape. I dunno, I worry where the guy's career's going. First he almost makes a Marvel movie, and now this? Urgh.MANTIS wrote:Why would anyone give money to Darren Aronofsky to make a Noah film that was faithful to the Bible? How could you possibly expect that result?
storm shadow wrote:This is what happens when people use the internet to get through adolescence, instead of drugs and heavy metal.
storm shadow wrote:This is what happens when people use the internet to get through adolescence, instead of drugs and heavy metal.
yes! that's the thread of all his movies for sure. framing this character that way could work well.spacehamster wrote:I can actually see how you could interpret Noah as an Aronofsky character - driven/obsessive to the point of self-destruction
it's top-tier trolling you've fallen victim to...MANTIS wrote:Takin me out of context...
It also would've worked great with Wolverine, but there's no way Marvel would've actually let him do it properly. That's the problem, not the fact that the characters/stories don't work for Aronofsky.Necrometer wrote:yes! that's the thread of all his movies for sure. framing this character that way could work well.spacehamster wrote:I can actually see how you could interpret Noah as an Aronofsky character - driven/obsessive to the point of self-destruction
storm shadow wrote:This is what happens when people use the internet to get through adolescence, instead of drugs and heavy metal.
The only way that could've been done was the way Terry Gilliam said - as a 12-epsiode TV series. And even that wasn't a great idea. The whole thing was doomed from the start, no matter who did it. Course it didn't help that they got that fucktard Snyder to do it, but in fairness, nobody could've pulled it off.Necrometer wrote: and... I just found out that in 2004 he was reported to be directing Watchmen ... that probably would not have gone so well
Prometheus was a terrible movie in every conceivable way except for the art direction, and a fine example of what happens when scripts get rewritten so many times that they turn into something with as much character as the release schedule of a new breakfast cereal.but then you have prometheus, which wasn't really pulling punches on its loopy grimness.
storm shadow wrote:This is what happens when people use the internet to get through adolescence, instead of drugs and heavy metal.
"you can't eat a sandwich with a clenched fist."Necrometer wrote:fucking scientists
no, you're not aloneBlair wrote:So... ...I'm the only one that thinks Gravity was a piece of shit?
"you can't eat a sandwich with a clenched fist."Necrometer wrote:fucking scientists
huhcaldwell.the.great wrote:Gravity - fucking awful/10
some great music in spots
I'm with you on a lot of this, but the dialogue/monologue stuff ruined it a lot more for me. pretty good use of 3D. Enjoyed it more than I did with Avatar - but I would have been happier with an hour and a half of nothing but 3D shots of astronauts floating through and around shit with the Earth in the background.elephants gerald wrote:gravity (imax 3D)- 7/10
maybe generous? I had fun, but I really expected this to be stranger and more bleak. the children of men connection had me maybe too hyped. so that was disappointing. this was, I think, the first 3D experience that I truly enjoyed, but I would have enjoyed it much more had the characters not said any of the things that they said. horrendous dialogue/monologue. I had problems with the music. and there were times when this felt like one of those universal simulation rides like terminator
but it looked really fucking cool, so I guess I can forgive most of this shitSPOILERSPOILER_SHOWthe first fire comes to mind
"you can't eat a sandwich with a clenched fist."Necrometer wrote:fucking scientists
It was a 90s Spotify mix a friend made for a party that he played through my laptop on my Last.fm account.Raw Ting wrote:man your playlist is EXCEPTIONALLY bad right now. was you girlfriend on your computer?
I couldn't help but be a bit dissappointed with this, and I am/ was (up to Zatoichi) a huge Kitano fan. I enjoy bleak, cold movies like this, but nevertheless I had been looking forward to something poetic as in Hana-Bi. It sure was better than the three movies before it IMHO. Btw did you enjoy those and if so, what exactly was it that made you like them?postaddiction wrote:Outrage (2010) - 8 - love Kitano's style so much, it almost doesn't matter what the movie is about.
The Bill wrote:Kids today with their artificially flavored kunt hands!