As a socialist of sorts I think that only men should get welfare. Men aren't the ones who pump out the children and since women do, it will de-incentivize women from having kids out of wedlock and I see only good things coming out of it. That way it will help men be financially stable and able to provide for their women and since women won't get it unless they're in a relationship it will tie them to the man and make it impossible for them to leave and if they do leave, nature will take care of the rest and she'll starve and the kids would too (in the current system). In an ideal system, the kids would stay with the father and there would be only 1 casualty. If the system wants to reduce loss of life, they would have to ultimately side with the father out of concerns for the children. Men are less of a tax burden, too, in comparison to women because of the additional mouths that have to be fed with said tax dollars, this would ultimately kill two birds with one stone as people would foot the bill for a lesser amount of people and men could actually pay their bills and rent on time, and women would be forced to marry in droves because those protections aren't afforded to them.
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 amDIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)