It’s a double edged sword. To take it easy on them would sort of be sexist in that, the men need to treat them like babies because they’re so much physically inferior vs. the men are typical misogynistic jock assholes that get a kick out of sending women back to the kitchen to be barefoot & pregnant. I say, most likely than not there has got the be some absolutely annoying bitches on that team that noise canceling headphones were created for, and hopefully this shuts them up for at least a few hours. Thereby, saving dogs and other enchanted hearing animals from noise pollution, temporarily as it may be.postaddiction wrote: ↑Thu Jun 01, 2023 5:27 pm US Women vs. Wrexham Red Dragons is on now. 0-7 after 19 minutes. I guess this one doesn't have a 5 goal cap. This would have been cool if it went the other way, but it's pretty gross seeing these taller/larger men just kick the everloving shit out of these women. Like maybe the men should just chill out for a little bit? Or would that be too obvious?
indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
- The Bill
- PLAID MEMBER
- Posts: 11484
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:33 am
- Location: Beyond the Oceans of Time and Space, Sometimes New York
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
- Toilet Fleet
- Lords of Porno
- Posts: 8543
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:49 pm
- Location: You can find me in the tub, bottle full of Bud.
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
I think a lot of art criticism can jump in a fuckin foot locker, but it is exquisite how many people are pointing out Hannah Gadsby's critical vapidity re: her Picasso show at the Brooklyn Museum
Apart from the suicide-justifying title of the show itself (It’s Pablo-matic: Picasso According to Hannah Gadsby), her let's say comedy (?) alongside the usual art-history faff is just inexcusable. "Don’t you hate it when you look like you belong in a Dickens novel but end up in a mosh pit at Burning Man? #MeToo"? What the fuck even is that
How fucking dare you
Apart from the suicide-justifying title of the show itself (It’s Pablo-matic: Picasso According to Hannah Gadsby), her let's say comedy (?) alongside the usual art-history faff is just inexcusable. "Don’t you hate it when you look like you belong in a Dickens novel but end up in a mosh pit at Burning Man? #MeToo"? What the fuck even is that
How fucking dare you
- FVBTVS
- Total Recluse
- Posts: 21116
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
yeah the nyt piece on it fuckin ruled
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/01/arts ... casso.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/01/arts ... casso.html
Art Review
With Hannah Gadsby’s ‘It’s Pablo-matic,’ the Joke’s on the Brooklyn Museum
The Australian comedian turns curator in a show about Picasso’s complicated legacy. But it’s women artists the exhibition really shortchanges.
By Jason Farago
June 1, 2023
If you studied art history or another of the humanities in the 1990s or 2000s — say, if you are around the age of the Australian comic Hannah Gadsby, 45 — you may remember the word “problematic” from your long-ago seminar days. Back then it was a voguish noun, borrowed from French, that described the unconscious structure of an ideology or a text. Soon, though, like so many other efforts to think critically, “the problematic” got left behind in this century’s great shift from reading to scrolling. These days we encounter “problematic” exclusively as an adjective: an offhand judgment of moral disapproval, from a speaker who can’t be bothered by precision.
A whole cast of professional art workers — conservators, designers, guards, technicians — has been roped in to produce “It’s Pablo-matic: Picasso According to Hannah Gadsby,” a small exhibition opening Friday at the Brooklyn Museum. (It is a title so silly that I cannot even type it; I am cutting and pasting.) The show, one of many worldwide timed to the 50th anniversary of the Spanish artist’s death in 1973, is essentially a light amusement following on from “Nanette,” a Netflix special from 2018. In that routine, a sort of blend of stand up and TED Talk, Gadsby riffed on having “barely graduated from an art history degree,” at the bachelor’s level, and attempted a takedown of the Spanish artist: “He’s rotten in the face cavity! I hate Picasso! I hate him!” Now this entertainer has come through the museum doors, but if you thought Gadsby had something to say about Picasso, the joke — the only good joke of the day, in fact — is on you.
Like the noun-turned-adjective “problematic,” this new exhibition backs away from close looking for the affirmative comforts of social-justice-themed pop culture. At the Brooklyn Museum you will find a few (very few) paintings by Picasso, plus two little sculptures and a selection of works on paper, suffixed with tame quips by Gadsby on adjacent labels. Around and nearby are works of art made by women, almost all made after Picasso’s death in 1973; finally, in a vestibule, clips from “Nanette” play on a loop. That’s the whole exhibition, and anyone who was expecting this to be a Netflix declension of the Degenerate Art Show, with poor patriarchal Picasso as ritualized scapegoat, can rest easy. There’s little to see. There’s no catalog to read. The ambitions here are at GIF level, though perhaps that is the point.
So far as it has an argument — a problematic — it goes like this: Pablo Picasso was an important artist. He was also something of a jerk around women. And women are more than “goddesses or doormats,” as Picasso brutally had it; women, too, have stories to tell. I wish there was more to inform you of, but that’s really about the size of it. All the feminist scholarship of the last 50 years — about repressed desire, about phallic instability, or even just about the lives of the women Picasso loved — is put to one side, in favor of what really matters: your feelings. “Admiration and anger can coexist,” a text at the show’s entrance reassures us.
That Picasso, probably the most written about painter in history, was both a great artist and a not-so-great guy is so far from being news as to qualify as climate. What matters is what you do with that friction, and “It’s Pablo-matic” does not do much. For a start, it doesn’t assemble many things to look at. The actual number of paintings by Picasso here is just eight. Seven were borrowed from the Musée Picasso in Paris, which has been supporting shows worldwide for this anniversary; one belongs to the Brooklyn Museum; none is first-rate. There are no other institutional loans besides a few prints brought over the river from MoMA. What you will see here by Picasso are mostly modest etchings, and even these barely display his stylistic breadth; more than two dozen sheets come from a single portfolio, the neoclassical Vollard Suite of the 1930s.
Unsigned texts in each gallery provide basic invocations of gender discrimination in art museums, or the colonial legacy of European modern art, while next to individual works Gadsby offers signed banter. These labels function a bit like bathroom graffiti, or maybe Instagram captions. Beside one classicizing print of Picasso and his lover Marie-Thérèse Walter: “I’m so virile my chest hair just exploded.” Beside a reclining nude: “Is she actually reclining? Or has she just been dropped from a great height?”
There’s a fixation, throughout, on genitals and bodily functions. Each sphincter, each phallus, is called out with adolescent excitement; with adolescent vocabulary, too. What jokes there are (“Meta? Hardly know her!”) remain juvenile enough to leave Picasso unscathed. The adults involved at the Brooklyn Museum (principally its senior curators Lisa Small and Catherine Morris, Gadsby’s collaborators here) really could have reined in this immaturity, though to their credit, they’ve at least fleshed out the show with some context on the cult of male genius or the rise of feminist art history in the 1970s.
The trouble is obvious, and entirely symptomatic of our back-to-front digital lives: For this show the reactions came first, the objects reacted to second. A show that started with pictures might make you come to wonder — following the pioneering feminist art historian Linda Nochlin — why Picasso’s paintings of women are generally lacking in desire, quite unlike the pervy paintings of Balthus, Picabia and other cancelable midcentury gents. A show properly engaged with feminism and the avant-garde might have turned to Lyubov Popova, Natalia Goncharova, Nadezhda Udaltsova or Olga Rozanova: the remarkable Soviet women artists who put Picasso’s breakdown of forms in the service of political revolution. A more serious look at reputation and male genius might have introduced a work by at least one female Cubist: perhaps Alice Bailly, or Marie Vassilieff, or Alice Halicka, or Marie Laurencin, or Jeanne Rij-Rousseau, or María Blanchard, or even Australia’s own Anne Dangar.
Instead, “It’s Pablo-matic” contents itself to stir in works by women from the Brooklyn Museum collection. These seem to have been selected more or less at random, and include a lithograph by Käthe Kollwitz, a photograph by Ana Mendieta, an assemblage by Betye Saar, and Dara Birnbaum’s “Technology/Transformation: Wonder Woman,” a video art classic of 1978/79 whose connection to Picasso is beyond me. (At least two paintings here, by Nina Chanel Abney and Mickalene Thomas, draw on the example of Manet, not Picasso.) The artists who made them have been reduced here, in what may be this show’s only true insult, into mere raconteurs of women’s lives. “I want my story to be heard,” reads a quotation from Gadsby in the last gallery; the same label lauds the “entirely new stories” of a new generation.
This elevation of “stories” over art (or at least comedy) was the principal thrust of “Nanette,” a Sydney stand-up routine which became an American viral success during the last presidency, shortly after the wrongdoings of Harvey Weinstein were finally exposed. “Nanette” proposed a therapeutic purpose for culture, rejecting the “trauma” of telling jokes in favor of the three-act resolution of “stories.” It directly analogized Picasso to then-President Trump: “The greatest artist of the twentieth century. Let’s make art great again, guys.” It even averred that Picasso, and by extension all the old masters, suffered from “the mental illness of misogyny.” (Given this pathologization of Picasso, it is very intriguing that Gadsby has described the Brooklyn Museum show as their own deeply desired act of sexual violence against the man from Málaga, telling Variety: “I really, really want to stick one up him.”)
Most bizarrely, the routine rested on a condemnation of art as an elite swindle, and modernism got it particularly hard. “CUUU-bism,” went Gadsby’s mocking refrain, to reliable audience laughter. (As it is, Picasso’s own Cubist art appears at the Brooklyn Museum through a single 6-by-4.5-inch engraving.) The sarcasm, from a comedian with moderate art historical bona fides, had a purpose: It gave Gadsby’s audience permission to believe that avant-garde painting was actually a big scam. “They’re all cut from the same cloth,” Gadsby told the audience in “Nanette”: “Donald Trump, Pablo Picasso, Harvey Weinstein” — and the art you never liked in the first place could be dismissed as the flimflam of a cabal of evil men.
Not long ago, it would have been embarrassing for adults to admit that they found avant-garde painting too difficult and preferred the comforts of story time. What Gadsby did was give the audience permission — moral permission — to turn their backs on what challenged them, and to ennoble a preference for comfort and kitsch.
So who should be most brassed off by this show? Not Picasso, who gets out totally unharmed. But the women artists in the museum’s collection dragooned into this minor prank, and the generations of women and feminist art historians — Rosalind Krauss, Anne Wagner, Mary Ann Caws, hundreds more — who have devoted their careers to thinking seriously about modern art and gender. Especially at the Brooklyn Museum, whose engagement with feminist art is unique in New York, I left sad and embarrassed that this show doesn’t even try to do what it promises: put women artists on equal footing with the big guy.
“My story has value,” Gadsby said in “Nanette”; and then, “I will not allow my story to be destroyed”; and then, “Stories hold our cure.” But Howardena Pindell, on view here, is much more than a storyteller; Cindy Sherman, on view here, is much more than a storyteller. They are artists who, like Picasso before them, put ideas and images into productive tension, with no reassurance of closure or comfort. The function of a public museum (or at least it should be) is to present to all of us these women’s full aesthetic achievements; there is also room for story hour, in the children’s wing.
Google it. My name is "Varg Vikernes".
I have 8 children.
I have 8 children.
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
spacehamster wrote: ↑Sat Aug 09, 2014 10:20 am Apparently this Kim Kelly person also works or used to work with Anal Cunt.
I find it a bit disconcerting that I know this much American scene drama, really.
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
If they get divorced I hope she has to pay him alimony.
- The Bill
- PLAID MEMBER
- Posts: 11484
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:33 am
- Location: Beyond the Oceans of Time and Space, Sometimes New York
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
What a dickhead
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- FVBTVS
- Total Recluse
- Posts: 21116
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
i love the idea of relationships completely falling apart over botched attempts at content creation
Google it. My name is "Varg Vikernes".
I have 8 children.
I have 8 children.
- The Bill
- PLAID MEMBER
- Posts: 11484
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:33 am
- Location: Beyond the Oceans of Time and Space, Sometimes New York
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
Remember in the 50’s wives would be okay if the husband stumped the secretary sometimes, but she know she ruled the family? The balance of power hasn’t sifted, it just became dumb.
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
It's over, Johnny
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- The Bill
- PLAID MEMBER
- Posts: 11484
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:33 am
- Location: Beyond the Oceans of Time and Space, Sometimes New York
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
Good! Can we go back to saving princess in games again.
- spacehamster
- Sweet Lord _______
- Posts: 19414
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:57 pm
- Location: just a-passin' thru
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
I got to the point where he says FF was created to "go after people like me", and then I dislocated my eyeballs from rolling them too hard. The reason these wheeze-creatures never leave the basement is because their victim complex is too big to fit through the door.
And I stand by what I said, btw - Sarkeesian's analysis was the most boilerplate Feminist Criticism 101 stuff imaginable, and the only reason anyone really talked about it was because all these shitlords had an angry boner for her.
And I stand by what I said, btw - Sarkeesian's analysis was the most boilerplate Feminist Criticism 101 stuff imaginable, and the only reason anyone really talked about it was because all these shitlords had an angry boner for her.
storm shadow wrote:This is what happens when people use the internet to get through adolescence, instead of drugs and heavy metal.
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
-
- Foaming at the mouth.
- Posts: 7218
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:17 pm
- FVBTVS
- Total Recluse
- Posts: 21116
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
what are you going to do assault me ?!
Google it. My name is "Varg Vikernes".
I have 8 children.
I have 8 children.
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
All I can say is that I hope the little pervert didn't enjoy it
he looks unhappy in the Grimace'd pic
he looks unhappy in the Grimace'd pic
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- Necrometer
- crippled god of the universe
- Posts: 64728
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:42 am
- Location: Feelin' fine.
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
sarkeesian forever
(the channel totally went to shit after the initial batch of videos, which were admittedly simple but IMO delightful...)
(the channel totally went to shit after the initial batch of videos, which were admittedly simple but IMO delightful...)
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
- FVBTVS
- Total Recluse
- Posts: 21116
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
derketa
Google it. My name is "Varg Vikernes".
I have 8 children.
I have 8 children.
- cxwx
- clown shaped void that used to be a human being
- Posts: 8751
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Location: Fifty Island Water
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
Quick, someone request Liturgy.
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
hi my name is Dasein Heidegger Hendrixand I'd like to request being that is particular to human beings, that is to say, vis a vis EXPERIENCING the band Liturgy's songs in a moment particular to the subject of time on YOUR YOUTUEB INTERNERNET FOR GIRLS YELLING
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- Eight Bit Alien
- need...miss...want...
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 1:43 am
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
*KNOCKS EVERYTHING OFF THE SHELF* NOW CLEAN IT UP
livid dealer wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:31 am DIO NEVER JUMPED ON WHAT WAS POPULAR (THE PROVERBIAL BANDWAGON)
AND DIO DIDNT FUCK GUYS
- Brutus Frank
- [citation needed]
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 11:56 pm
Re: indomitable nth-wave feminism thread [RAPE CULTURE 101]
Wild, so that's a double he sends on tour then?spacehamster wrote: ↑Thu Aug 31, 2023 10:46 am I got to the point where he says FF was created to "go after people like me", and then I dislocated my eyeballs from rolling them too hard. The reason these wheeze-creatures never leave the basement is because their victim complex is too big to fit through the door.