Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
- valgalder
- Wandering Johnny!
- Posts: 6972
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: chicago
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
so people that don't know trans-gender folks all supposed to know all the PC terms? I'm still confused at what i'm supposed to say, and i'm actually trying to be respectful.
Skyclun wrote: Explain to me how I'm dumb for not knowing how PayPal works.
- Necrometer
- crippled god of the universe
- Posts: 64811
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:42 am
- Location: Feelin' fine.
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
so when you say "cis gender" the cis means same, right? same as what?
I think the answer is SEX
but I don't know why Mari is trying to avoid that word since it's helpful
I understand it as
sex --> biology
gender --> culture
I think the answer is SEX
but I don't know why Mari is trying to avoid that word since it's helpful
I understand it as
sex --> biology
gender --> culture
Last edited by Necrometer on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mari_Mar
- Sir Posts-A-Lot
- Posts: 13635
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Necrometer wrote:so when you say "cis gender" the cis means same, right? same as what?
Last edited by Mari_Mar on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pisscubes wrote:"Females, as a whole, are horrible, souless creatures bent on the destruction of males".
- Necrometer
- crippled god of the universe
- Posts: 64811
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:42 am
- Location: Feelin' fine.
- elephants gerald
- One Of Many Accounts
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
yeah I was about to post the same thing, basically.
'cis' suggests that there are two components that are similarly oriented- here 'sex (at birth)' and 'gender.' saying 'cis gender' seems incoherent to me
'cis' suggests that there are two components that are similarly oriented- here 'sex (at birth)' and 'gender.' saying 'cis gender' seems incoherent to me
- Mari_Mar
- Sir Posts-A-Lot
- Posts: 13635
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
So, is the term "transgender" equally incoherent?elephants gerald wrote:yeah I was about to post the same thing, basically.
'cis' suggests that there are two components that are similarly oriented- here 'sex (at birth)' and 'gender.' saying 'cis gender' seems incoherent to me
Pisscubes wrote:"Females, as a whole, are horrible, souless creatures bent on the destruction of males".
- elephants gerald
- One Of Many Accounts
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
no no, 'cis gender' isn't even really incoherent. I was unclear.
geoff asked you how to talk about the gender we're physically born with, you said 'cis gender.' he didn't ask what the term is for someone whose biological sex and whose gender are aligned. to say that you identify as a female but that your 'cis gender' is male is what doesn't make sense.
geoff asked you how to talk about the gender we're physically born with, you said 'cis gender.' he didn't ask what the term is for someone whose biological sex and whose gender are aligned. to say that you identify as a female but that your 'cis gender' is male is what doesn't make sense.
Last edited by elephants gerald on Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Mari_Mar
- Sir Posts-A-Lot
- Posts: 13635
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Oh, I see. I misread Geoff's question.elephants gerald wrote:no no, 'cis gender' isn't even really incoherent. I was unclear.
geoff asked you how to talk about the gender we're physically born with, you said 'cis gender.' he didn't ask what the term is for someone whose biological sex and whose gender are aligned. to say that you identify as a female but that your 'cis gender' is male is what doesn't make sense.
"Male assigned at birth" would be the politically correct answer in that case.
Pisscubes wrote:"Females, as a whole, are horrible, souless creatures bent on the destruction of males".
- riley-o
- Chad Thundercock
- Posts: 38993
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: Inside Crystal Mouvntain
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Who fucking cares about the right term at this point ? Can we take it for granted at this point after this many years that I'm trying to engage the discussion in an open and honest manner and actually express my point without insulting people or fucking keep down the underclass or whatever ? The minute it becomes "well you used the wrong term and we can't actually talk about anything until you use the right term" you suck all the wind out of what could be a mutually enlightening conversation and we go into a semantics debate which is to say basically insist that everyone keep sticking to their originally held conceptions with no openness to change.
I'm genuinely trying to understand, express and relate and have felt that from others as well, but can't help but feel I'm being lectured to from you, Marissa. I understand you have a vested interest in all things trans but you should try to understand that I also have an emotional commitment to all things relating to fighting. So we both have our area of expertise here and maybe it would be nice if instead of playing the role of educator you instead try and have a conversation without the agendas.
I'm genuinely trying to understand, express and relate and have felt that from others as well, but can't help but feel I'm being lectured to from you, Marissa. I understand you have a vested interest in all things trans but you should try to understand that I also have an emotional commitment to all things relating to fighting. So we both have our area of expertise here and maybe it would be nice if instead of playing the role of educator you instead try and have a conversation without the agendas.
HEAD BOPPAZ RECORDS YOU BITCH-ASS HOES
- Mari_Mar
- Sir Posts-A-Lot
- Posts: 13635
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Again, I misread your context...Pisscubes wrote:Cool. Now what's the difference between "male assigned at birth" and "born physically male" which was initially cited as offensive?
Pisscubes wrote:"Females, as a whole, are horrible, souless creatures bent on the destruction of males".
-
- Olde Timer
- Posts: 5104
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:58 pm
- Location: Bob Hoskins, NC
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Would now be an inappropriate time to ask who Joe Rogan is?
"It is the maze that dreams. And I am lost."
-
- Olde Timer
- Posts: 5104
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:58 pm
- Location: Bob Hoskins, NC
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Or would it be cis Joe Rogan?
"It is the maze that dreams. And I am lost."
- Kurt Russell's Beard
- Freakin Insane & Stuff..
- Posts: 2733
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 2:55 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Well, I was trying to figure stuff out with you. If you have a moment, maybe respond to my last post about the motivation aspect?riley-o wrote:Who fucking cares about the right term at this point ? Can we take it for granted at this point after this many years that I'm trying to engage the discussion in an open and honest manner and actually express my point without insulting people or fucking keep down the underclass or whatever ? The minute it becomes "well you used the wrong term and we can't actually talk about anything until you use the right term" you suck all the wind out of what could be a mutually enlightening conversation and we go into a semantics debate which is to say basically insist that everyone keep sticking to their originally held conceptions with no openness to change.
I'm genuinely trying to understand, express and relate and have felt that from others as well, but can't help but feel I'm being lectured to from you, Marissa. I understand you have a vested interest in all things trans but you should try to understand that I also have an emotional commitment to all things relating to fighting. So we both have our area of expertise here and maybe it would be nice if instead of playing the role of educator you instead try and have a conversation without the agendas.
- Mari_Mar
- Sir Posts-A-Lot
- Posts: 13635
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 4:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
No. That would be completely accurate. (if you're using the term correctly.)Pisscubes wrote:So in terms of talking about a cis gender male (if I'm using that term ok) you personally wouldn't be offended by the term "born physically male"?
Pisscubes wrote:"Females, as a whole, are horrible, souless creatures bent on the destruction of males".
- Scumfucker
- Jesus never gave me that bike!
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:32 pm
- Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Cis is pronounced how out loud? Like sis? Like kiss? Or you just say crossover?
- elephants gerald
- One Of Many Accounts
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:19 pm
- the awesome Assassin
- Sweet Lord _______
- Posts: 16783
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
sis sis, or sumpthing...
- riley-o
- Chad Thundercock
- Posts: 38993
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: Inside Crystal Mouvntain
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
This is one of her fights.
Call me insensitive or a Jofa or transphobic or whatever you like, but this sure looks an awful lot like a man beating up a woman.
HEAD BOPPAZ RECORDS YOU BITCH-ASS HOES
- Scumfucker
- Jesus never gave me that bike!
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:32 pm
- Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
I don't think that's anything close to a fair fight.
- Kurt Russell's Beard
- Freakin Insane & Stuff..
- Posts: 2733
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 2:55 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Yeah, that's the one I saw. Totally dominant, not even a contest. The only other woman fighter I've seen that looks that powerful is Cyborg, and she's currently suspended for steroids. Cyborg to me looks like a man beating up a woman.riley-o wrote:
This is one of her fights.
Call me insensitive or a Jofa or transphobic or whatever you like, but this sure looks an awful lot like a man beating up a woman.
Is there a way to measure Fox's muscle mass, strength, bone density, etc.? If she's closer to a male performance than a female performance, this isn't going to work at all.
EDIT: They need to pit Fox against a good fighter. I couldn't tell if that opponent was just a beginner or was made to look like a beginner because Fox was so dominant.
- elephants gerald
- One Of Many Accounts
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
I think it's clear that the e-z cis/trans gender model isn't sufficient for our purposes and that if we're going to catalog gender with any thoroughness, we need to introduce an additional r-s naming convention. for the purposes of MMA fighting.
priorities would be as follows:
1. punch and kick newtons (avg)
2. bone density
3. approximate jaw size (in z'dars)
these are measured in standard deviations away from the women's mean, and then those standard deviation values are ordered numerically. if (high to low) the order comes in at 1, 2, 3 (where the fighter has perhaps demonstrated exceptional punching power, above average bone density, and a passably feminine jaw) the fighter is labeled 'R' and will compete with other men. '3, 1, 2' fighters also are granted the 'R' designation, as are '2, 3, 1' fighters. if it's determined that a fighter has a sky-high jaw value and an above average bone density score, but only average female punch and kick newtons, then that (3, 2, 1) fighter is labeled an 'S' and will compete with their fellow women. a '2, 1, 3' scoring (bones, newtons, z'dar) and a '1, 3, 2' will also lead to 'S' categorization and will open up the doors to future competition in women's mixed martial arts
priorities would be as follows:
1. punch and kick newtons (avg)
2. bone density
3. approximate jaw size (in z'dars)
these are measured in standard deviations away from the women's mean, and then those standard deviation values are ordered numerically. if (high to low) the order comes in at 1, 2, 3 (where the fighter has perhaps demonstrated exceptional punching power, above average bone density, and a passably feminine jaw) the fighter is labeled 'R' and will compete with other men. '3, 1, 2' fighters also are granted the 'R' designation, as are '2, 3, 1' fighters. if it's determined that a fighter has a sky-high jaw value and an above average bone density score, but only average female punch and kick newtons, then that (3, 2, 1) fighter is labeled an 'S' and will compete with their fellow women. a '2, 1, 3' scoring (bones, newtons, z'dar) and a '1, 3, 2' will also lead to 'S' categorization and will open up the doors to future competition in women's mixed martial arts
- Scumfucker
- Jesus never gave me that bike!
- Posts: 4462
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:32 pm
- Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Wait a minute sir, if we are figuring jaw size, what of the Adams apple? Does it make it easier or harder to get choked out?
-
- ultimate EVIL
- Posts: 6728
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:08 pm
- Location: pee-pee soaked heckhole
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
I haven't been able to keep up with this thread today, but has this been posted? I'll just leave this here.
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/3/20/41 ... on-fox-has
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/3/20/41 ... on-fox-has
jefferson wrote:If you want a picture of the future, imagine a palm against a human face... forever.
- a world of no
- Olde Timer
- Posts: 5105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:25 pm
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
Seriously... anyone can say "medical experts believe ~" and spout any fucking semi-plausible bullshit they want and make retards believe the point you're trying to get across is valid. That's not to say this particular example of yours is invalid, but holy fuck... can you provide some documented proof for once? Your claims are fucking moot without evidence, which just keeps this bullshit discussion going on, and on, and on... until someone's ego gives them an orgasm.Mari_Mar wrote:Medical experts believe that we know our genders between the ages of 2 and 4.the awesome Assassin wrote:What age do we know what sex we are...
oh hey!
Ray wrote:I haven't been able to keep up with this thread today, but has this been posted? I'll just leave this here.
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/3/20/41 ... on-fox-has
And I believe this leans in favor of one of Riley's earlier arguments?Gender is more of an identity. It's how you identify yourself. Sex is multi-layered.
1. Chromosomally, what you are
2. Hormonally, what you are
3. Gender, how you're identifying yourself
It's actually very complicated, and I believe that the Olympics actually takes these on a case by case basis. In this particular instance, Fox might potentially have an unfair advantage over the females she faces, because she developed all the way into adulthood as a male. There would be increased musculature, and an increased ability to build muscle, so an advantage might be present due to years of conditioning and becoming more masculine, which includes differences in endurance and strength. The male body develops differently, both in skeletal structure and muscularly.
When pitted against an average female, I would say that there were probably some advantages that the hormonal blockade and subsequent replacement can't take away 100%, simply because she lived so much of her life as a male, and developed fully as such.
Something that also has to be considered is called imprinting of the brain. Male imprinting happens with testosterone during development. If no testosterone is present, you tend to have a female brain. Developing fetuses that have testosterone have male imprinting of the brain, and it does not go away after androgen suppression and sex change surgery. It is a permanent imprint on the brain.
Someone that has had male imprinting could have the potential for more aggression or more aggressive type behavior than a female brain. That's something that could affect her and possibly give her a mental edge in how she fights and how aggressive she might be, compared to a biologically born female.
-
- ultimate EVIL
- Posts: 6728
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:08 pm
- Location: pee-pee soaked heckhole
Re: Fuck It. Joe Rogan Podcast Thread
jefferson wrote:If you want a picture of the future, imagine a palm against a human face... forever.