Geeheeb wrote:I smell my own BO. Its really hot here in the box office.
![Image](http://i37.tinypic.com/15hfite.gif)
Geeheeb wrote:I smell my own BO. Its really hot here in the box office.
Can you gif it?Necrometer wrote:they totally fixed this in the new trailer, BTWNecrometer wrote:LOL @ gun/arm mushing on the mech:
In fact that whole shot is remarkably different, they fixed the lighting and everything so it looks gritty instead of shiny and shitty
Also, more ripoff alert: http://io9.com/5390226/did-james-camero ... ns-novella
soiled depends wrote:her mom sounds like miss piggy choking on a huge juicy cock...
Oh. sup guys.Necrometer wrote:I lack those skills, and the real thing will be out tomorrow, so it's really not worth the bother.
You're on the edge Ross.Necrometer wrote: This movie is such a fucking sci-fantasy wet dream for me... I might have to do some drugs again the first time I see it. I still haven't seen Titanic and am wondering if I should do so just to calibrate my douchexpectations.
Edge of what? Forever shaming now now-broken edge?MANTIS wrote:You're on the edge Ross.Necrometer wrote: This movie is such a fucking sci-fantasy wet dream for me... I might have to do some drugs again the first time I see it. I still haven't seen Titanic and am wondering if I should do so just to calibrate my douchexpectations.
THE EDGE.
YOU CAN TOTALLY SEE CCH IN THE NEW TRAILERParachute wrote:It's got CCH Pounder from The Shield!
No no no, Titanic would be sober for sure. Drugs for AvatarMANTIS wrote:Drugs? Titanic?
The EDGE man.
The movie is 161 minutes and flies by in a rush. Repeat business? You bet. “Titanic”-level business? That level may never be reached again, but Fox will see more than enough grosses worldwide to cover its bet on Cameron.
But let’s cut to the chase: A fully believable, flesh-and-blood (albeit not human flesh and blood) romance is the beating heart of “Avatar.” Cameron has never made a movie just to show off visual pyrotechnics: Every bit of technology in “Avatar” serves the greater purpose of a deeply felt love story.
As with everything in “Avatar,” Cameron has coolly thought things through. With every visual tool he can muster, he takes viewers through the battle like a master tactician, demonstrating how every turn in the fight, every valiant death or cowardly act, changes its course. The screen is alive with more action and the soundtrack pops with more robust music than any dozen sci-fi shoot-’em-ups you care to mention…
In years of development and four years of production no detail in the pic is unimportant. Cameron’s collaborators excel beginning with the actors. Whether in human shape or as natives, they all bring terrific vitality to their roles.
Mauro Fiore’s cinematography is dazzling as it melts all the visual elements into a science-fiction whole. You believe in Pandora. Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg’s design brings Cameron’s screenplay to life with disarming ease.
James Horner’s score never intrudes but subtlety eggs the action on while the editing attributed to Cameron, Stephen Rivkin and John Refoua maintains a breathless pace that exhilarates rather than fatigues. Not a minute is wasted; there is no down time.
The only question is: How will Cameron ever top this?
It’s been twelve years since Titanic, but the King of the World has returned with a flawed but fantastic tour de force that, taken on its merits as a film, especially in two dimensions, warrants four stars. However, if you can wrap a pair of 3D glasses round your peepers, this becomes a transcendent, full-on five-star experience that's the closest we'll ever come to setting foot on a strange new world. Just don’t leave it so long next time, eh, Jim?
There are a couple full reviews that popped up in the UK:
The Sun: The final battle scene is 20 minutes long and absolutely mind-blowing…It is overwhelming, and that is because you are emotionally tied up in the characters and the story.
The Guardian: There have been a lot of rumours…Rumours that the 3D effects were making people nauseous. Rumours that the film, two hours and 40 minutes long, was a complete car crash.The Guardian can reveal that the last two are untrue. The film does not make you feel sick and it is not a disaster
Alex from Firstshowing: James Cameron is a freakin’ genius! I can’t say much but wow, I loved it. Avatar was phenomenal, pretty much blew me away… I can’t answer any questions guys but I can say I loved it. Also saw Neill Blomkamp at our screening, he loved it too.
Comingsoon: I’ll take my chances with Fox legal…. Avatar was amazing, I loved it!
And here are some more twitter reactions:
@petershall: “The AVATAR buzz is an understatement. That movie was unbelievable.”
@chasewhale: “Just finished AVATAR. Special effects were top notch. The movie ran a little long for my likings but I liked it!”
@comingsoonnet” “Okay, about Avatar?…. WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW! Unbelievable… amazing.”
@MikePereira21: Was blown away by Avatar! For 150 minutes, I was a kid again. Thank you James Cameron! BTW, the groundbreaking 3D was mindblowing.”
@rejects: “I’m not supposed to talk about Avatar… That said, it was a spectacular experience. Like nothing I’ve seen before.”
@markwalters74: “Just saw AVATAR. Not allowed to talk about it yet. Not allowed to say how it’s an amazing visual feast, or that Jimmy C’s still got the gift.”
@dmann11: “Holy effing crap!!! Avatar was FREAKING AWESOME KICK ASS SWEET!!!!!”
@TheGate: “For the record ‘Avatar’ was worth the $400 million, and no it is not even remotely “vomit inducing”.
Sound to me like this movie is going to be everything that James Cameron said it would! And I am more excited than ever to watch it!
Stefando...suteli-bunn wrote:holy shit... a love story? can't miss!
you never wanted to diddle blue chicks?delmuerte wrote:Okay, so...is this like the unofficial World Of Warcraft movie or something? What's the big deal?
I know exactly what you mean, but I've seen a good chunk of the movie and there's some broad-spectrum "entertainment" value present for sure, i.e. it's not a chore to watch once you get over the technique employed. I think it will work in the way that Wall-E did - nothing groundbreaking story-wise, but rather classically-assembled storytelling that's visually gratifying.Sineadrepresent wrote:Jesus, nothing about this looks even remotely watchable.
The reviews that were posted on RT don't really make it sound like a good film as much as an exercise in new technology and therefor not proper reviews in a cinematic sense. I'd say that's a bad sign.