Page 3 of 7

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:25 pm
by Necrometer
spacehamster wrote:Image

Post more non-offensive fictional sports team logos.
spacehamster wrote:Image
:moreawesome:

really resenting being employed right now

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:09 pm
by RY4N
this exactly what i wanted


Los angeles fags vs New york jews

dallas crackers vs miami boat rowers

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:13 pm
by Cryptoplasty
Why weren't you guys offended by this 5 years ago?

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:16 pm
by Necrometer
Dec 11 is the best I can do

/viewtopic.php?p=1498802#p1498802

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:19 pm
by Whee of the Dead
I'm kinda with Zero Hero on this one.

Bullshit, racist name but let the organization take the hit on that one. It seems silly that the trademark office needs to do some white knighting.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:22 pm
by Necrometer
Whee of the Dead wrote:I'm kinda with Zero Hero on this one.

Bullshit, racist name
doesn't really sound like you're with him...

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:23 pm
by james
Necrometer wrote:hey fuckface, almost all of these people are just EXPRESSING that they think this racist cartoon is in bad taste

no one is trying to bring down the first amendment
I was just making a dumb joke, Ross.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 6:48 pm
by james
Googling around for images. Holy shit, the entire NFL needs new logos. These are all absolutely terrible.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:01 pm
by Necrometer
james wrote:
Necrometer wrote:hey fuckface, almost all of these people are just EXPRESSING that they think this racist cartoon is in bad taste

no one is trying to bring down the first amendment
I was just making a dumb joke, Ross.
:? :( :cry: :oops: :brokenheart: :lhug:

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:14 pm
by Zap Rowsdower
Image

This one been posted yet?

Who cares if the Redskins keep their name? Well I suppose actual "redskins" do, and they have a pretty good reason. The anti-PC fuck crowd have 1) the anti-PC fucks argument, or 2) the sentimental fan argument. Neither seem like sufficient reasons to keep Redskins to the detriment of redskins.

Dan Snyder is among the world's greatest dickholes. Objective hatred of him among everyone should be reason enough to support a name change.
It seems silly that the trademark office needs to do some white knighting.
There's not much incentive for politicization within the PTO and among the TTAB. This was decided using a standard affirmed by the D.C. Federal Appellate Circuit, which has exclusive jurisdiction over all administrative agency appeals. A contrary decision would've been reversed on appeal, unless the appellate court overturned the current law. Regardless, a lower tribunal, especially an administrative one without job security, would be insane for going against controlling precedent from a Federal appeals court.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:26 pm
by Necrophilic Mallard
Whee of the Dead wrote: It seems silly that the trademark office needs to do some white knighting.
But that's not at all what is happening; they're upholding the law that makes it illegal to hold a trademark on "disparaging content".
The Native American group bringing the claim proved it once back in 1999, but they lost on appeal due to a technicality.
They seem to have overcome that technicality this time around...but it will still be appealed; the last appeal took 6 years.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:30 pm
by antinatalism
i'm offended by everything

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:46 pm
by The Torsion
Zap Rowsdower wrote:Image

This one been posted yet?

Who cares if the Redskins keep their name? Well I suppose actual "redskins" do, and they have a pretty good reason. The anti-PC fuck crowd have 1) the anti-PC fucks argument, or 2) the sentimental fan argument. Neither seem like sufficient reasons to keep Redskins to the detriment of redskins.

Dan Snyder is among the world's greatest dickholes. Objective hatred of him among everyone should be reason enough to support a name change.
It seems silly that the trademark office needs to do some white knighting.
There's not much incentive for politicization within the PTO and among the TTAB. This was decided using a standard affirmed by the D.C. Federal Appellate Circuit, which has exclusive jurisdiction over all administrative agency appeals. A contrary decision would've been reversed on appeal, unless the appellate court overturned the current law. Regardless, a lower tribunal, especially an administrative one without job security, would be insane for going against controlling precedent from a Federal appeals court.
Major lawyer douche chills..

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:49 pm
by Zap Rowsdower
Ok, that's fine. But that's exactly the reason why it happened. All your feels can't change that.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:55 pm
by The Torsion
Lol I don't care what the patent office says. And shysters only care to the extent that they can manipulate. Just what the country needs: another fuckin lawyer.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:04 pm
by Zap Rowsdower
The Torsion wrote:Lol I don't care what the patent office says.
So the subject of this thread shouldn't bother you then? Because it is something they said.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:08 pm
by Cryptoplasty
This topic is the true definition of internet hive mind hype train. Hop on.

I still don't understand why people weren't flailing around about this a long time ago. Suddenly the internet is shocked and appalled at something that's been a staple of American sports for decades. That's why I can't take any of this seriously.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:12 pm
by The Torsion
Faggits gonna faggit and some shyster will always find a way to capitalize on said faggotry to make a name for themselves.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:20 pm
by Zap Rowsdower
Cryptoplasty wrote:This topic is the true definition of internet hive mind hype train. Hop on.

I still don't understand why people weren't flailing around about this a long time ago. Suddenly the internet is shocked and appalled at something that's been a staple of American sports for decades. That's why I can't take any of this seriously.
That's fine for the Tumblr SJW reaction and commentary and all. But the people who sued to have the trademark voided were flailing around for a long time. They have been trying to do this for decades. The internet hive mind picked up on something people with a grievance (which has now been blessed as legitimate) fought for a long time to achieve.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:25 pm
by FVBTVS
quit spoutin yer dang aids talk all up in our thread of real men discussin reality and freedom ya fagit :betternotstartanyshit:

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:31 pm
by The Torsion
Lol a bunch of FUK U DAD millennial screeching does not legitimize this horseshit.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:19 pm
by featherboa
i'm not mad
i'm just disappointed

thank you spacehamster for trying

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:22 pm
by featherboa
It doesn't even have to be an slur. You could try to call your team the Cleveland American Indians or First Peoples or whatever, they still wouldn't want to be the mascot for settler entertainment sports fun.

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:00 pm
by Necrometer
Zap Rowsdower wrote:
Cryptoplasty wrote:This topic is the true definition of internet hive mind hype train. Hop on.

I still don't understand why people weren't flailing around about this a long time ago. Suddenly the internet is shocked and appalled at something that's been a staple of American sports for decades. That's why I can't take any of this seriously.
That's fine for the Tumblr SJW reaction and commentary and all. But the people who sued to have the trademark voided were flailing around for a long time. They have been trying to do this for decades. The internet hive mind picked up on something people with a grievance (which has now been blessed as legitimate) fought for a long time to achieve.
:tup:

Re: Redskins’ Kike Owner Refuses To Change Team’s Offensive

Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:37 pm
by Zerohero
Necrometer wrote:
Zap Rowsdower wrote:
Cryptoplasty wrote:This topic is the true definition of internet hive mind hype train. Hop on.

I still don't understand why people weren't flailing around about this a long time ago. Suddenly the internet is shocked and appalled at something that's been a staple of American sports for decades. That's why I can't take any of this seriously.
That's fine for the Tumblr SJW reaction and commentary and all. But the people who sued to have the trademark voided were flailing around for a long time. They have been trying to do this for decades. The internet hive mind picked up on something people with a grievance (which has now been blessed as legitimate) fought for a long time to achieve.
:tup:
we should all be able to bootleg Cradle of Filth merch because church people's have "a grievance"

I should be able to open a hamburger joint called "McDonalds" because that guy that made supersize me has a grievance with McDonalds, Inc.

I should be able to make my own fake Nike's because there are those with a grievance over sweat shops.