Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:09 am
she looks better with the new nose
Generic Business Oriented Website
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
https://www.reeelapse.com/
Lady GaGa
Page 7 of 91
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:15 am
she looks better with the new nose
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:21 am
ew - really? fuck face surgery...
well then put them here alreadyStreven Adler wrote:no. they were pictures or her bent all the way over during a performance at lollapalooza, pre hair dye and nose job.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:28 pm
Why? It's a minor alteration and it looks better, what's the big deal?Necrometer wrote:ew - really? fuck face surgery...
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:12 pm
I agree. What's the big deal?monsterod wrote:Why? It's a minor alteration and it looks better, what's the big deal?Necrometer wrote:ew - really? fuck face surgery...
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:37 pm
because they aren't being authentic to who they were born as. they're trying to fool ross, and he doesn't appreciate that.
personally, i figure it for a work-related investment.
personally, i figure it for a work-related investment.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:52 pm
Mari_Mar wrote:I agree. What's the big deal?monsterod wrote:Why? It's a minor alteration and it looks better, what's the big deal?Necrometer wrote:ew - really? fuck face surgery...
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:57 pm
exactly! impregnate a hottie, then out pops a beaknose? no thanksthürstön.3®®0® wrote:they're trying to fool ross, and he doesn't appreciate that.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:00 pm
it's official: ross wanted lady gaga to have his kid. but unfortunately, her past looks trump her obvious UberMusicMensch status what done attracted him in the first place.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:01 pm
positively perfect precis 
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:01 pm
She still looks like an old mushroom.thürstön.3®®0® wrote:it's official: ross wanted lady gaga to have his kid. but unfortunately, her past looks trump her obvious UberMusicMensch status what done attracted him in the first place.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:04 pm
it's ok, a mans gotta have standards, no matter how wildly subjective they might be. AMIRIGHT!?Necrometer wrote:positively perfect precis
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:05 pm
yep, she's one nice little slice of fuckfungus.Comrade Slinky wrote: She still looks like an old mushroom.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:37 pm
She's either a shemale or a really ugly broad.
Does not inspire erections.
Does not inspire erections.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:27 pm
reeesearch
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:30 pm
I think I like her lower half a wee bit more than the top...Looks like she sports a pair of low-hangers.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:31 pm
i gotta admit, she's definitely got the innsmouth look in that last one.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:39 pm
hahahahathürstön.3®®0® wrote:i gotta admit, she's definitely got the innsmouth look in that last one.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:53 pm
downs syndrome eyes.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 8:31 pm
well then maybe i'll impregnate her after all
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:57 pm
that ain't so bad
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:07 pm
the nose is covered...Necrometer wrote:
that ain't so bad
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:08 pm
What about the sagtit?
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:13 pm
It's not downs syndrome, it's fetal alcohol syndrome eyes.copstache wrote:downs syndrome eyes.
Re: Lady GaGa
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:26 pm
i'm sayin - it's less saggy there (bare) than in the other one, which means it was misrepresented due to being squashedBlack Jacques wrote:What about the sagtit?
don't get me wrong, i loathe the sag, but earlier pics were blowing it out of proportion