Re: European Mens, what's the migrant crisis look like from where you are?
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:36 am
Chad certainly is more likable, uh, for what it's worth I guess?
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
https://www.reeelapse.com/
‘Bradford is very inbred. There is a huge amount of cousins marrying each other there.’
Studies have shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins – and in Bradford, this rises to 75 per cent
Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, which promotes the image of Muslims in Britain, said: ‘I know many Muslims who have married their cousins and none of them have had a problem with their children.
joefromthegarage wrote:
Look at this fucking Becky.
Fuck off jofacain wrote:Europe is a mud pit
None of those nations are ass kissing American puppet states. Again, you are displaying American narcissism, the world does not revolve around your nation. The intervention was a success initially as it beat back the Taliban and allowed the norther region and Kabul to be regained by the Dari Afghans. Pashtun Afghanistan remained volatile, partly due to conflicted loyalties as Pashtun nationalism is a component of Taliban ideology and this appealed to some Afghan Pashtuns. The problem was that USA stupidly considered Pakistan an ally when it wasn't. As soon as foreign forces arrived in Afghanistan, the Taliban and al-Qaeda command just retreated back over the border into Pakistan, where they were safely protected by the Pakistanis. Once there, the Taliban could regroup and replenish their ranks with new recruits before hopping back over into Afganistan to continue their fight. This situation persisted for years and caused the conflict to drag on. Bin Laden wasn't trained by the USA. He was an Arab who had saw the chaos in Afghanistan as an opportunity to form his caliphate there. He wasn't Afghan mujahideen. The Arabs got in the way of the Afghans fighting the Soviets and even fought against the Afghans at some points. Bin Laden hated the USA because he needed to overthrow the regimes in Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Saudi etc. in order to establish his caliphate and he realised that he couldn't do this for as long as those regimes had US backing. Your rose-tinted view of bin Laden is revolting. Are you a jihadist yourself? The Taliban were busy slaughtering the ethnic Tajiks, Hazara and various other minority groups in Afganistan pre-2001. They are takfiris meaning they murder anyone they deem not to be Muslim enough. With takfiris, that net keeps getting cast wider and they so they murder more and more people. 80% of civilian deaths post-2001 have been from the Taliban. The remaining 20% from a mix of foreign military, United Islamic Front and latterly the Afghan military. Afghanistan in 2001 was not Iraq in 2003. Afghanistan had been at civil war for the previous 5 years whereas Iraq was more or less at peace. Likely more civilians would've died had the 2001 intervention not taken place. However, far more have died than need have done had the Americans not made the stupid mistake of remaining allied to Pakistan the entire time. Would you have just left the Taliban to slaughter the remaining Afghan resistance? Then to rule, ISIS-style, over the conquered Afghans? The Taliban Emirate" as they themselves called it, also provided a base to the globes premier jihadists ("al-Qaeda" means "the base" in Arabic, that base was Afghanistan). Not just 9/11 but also terrorist attacks in various North African and Middle Eastern nations were planned from Afghanistan and carried out by the jihadists trained and based there.
I particularly enjoyed towards the end when he said I have "typical right wing attitudes"Are you seriously disputing that globally, Muslims are more dogmatic than Christians? It's a stereotype of Americans that they are insular and you certainly uphold it well. Do you mean the Arab invasion and conquest of the Phoenician Middle East followed by the 800 years of Turkish Ottoman colonialism? Or the 25 years of French and British colonialism tacked on at the end? And don't regurgitate the "Sykes-Picot" argument, so beloved of Islamists. Nearly all non-Islamic nations in the developing world were colonised at one point and most for far longer than any Islamic nation. Yet none have the unique problems of Islamic nations. There is no oil in northern Nigeria, yet Boko Haram have arisen. There is no oil in Indonesia yet Aceh has become an Islamist theocracy. There are no significant oil reserves in Philippines, Yemen, Somalia, Bangladesh, Mali, Egypt, Afghanistan, and many more Islamic nations which all have a high level of Islamist militancy. Venezuela is swimming in oil yet isn't exporting religious terrorists. Only a handful of Muslim-majority nations are amongst the poorest on the planet. Those equally poor and poorer non-Islamic nations are not producing religious terrorism. Besides, poverty does not beget violence. That's a typical right wing attitude for you to have. You seem the type of person who would also say "The Muslim Arab enslavement of black Africans, millions more than the Europeans enslaved, has no effect on Muslim Arab attitudes towards black people in the modern day. Even though the common Arabic word for black person is 'Abd' which literally means slave".
When I hand your ass back to you on a regular basis, do you post my rebuttals on other messageboards as well? Because you should. As the saying goes, "Meatgrease is always right"Cascade Whore wrote:This was from an actual European in an argument I was having with him about colonialism and U.S. imperialism/adventurism. It seems like he may have handed me my ass a bit. He does come from the point of view that "muslimification" is a legitimate threat because he sees Muslims as having their religions much more ingrained into their identity compared to Christians. Earlier though he had contradicted himself a bit as saying there had been indigenous white Muslims living in Bosnia for hundreds of years that don't have the same issues. Anyways here's some quotes from this person who does seem to be pretty well versed on the details of the history of the region and the specific mid east conflicts we've over the last 16 years. I'm loath to repost this as it's the same kind of rhetoric whether intentional or not that people like meatgrease will latch onto to justify their racism. Maybe another European can pic apart his points and decide of he's full of shit or not:
I particularly enjoyed towards the end when he said I have "typical right wing attitudes"
I can't speak to the former part because my historical knowledge of the Middle East is scant but I can address two of his points. The idea that Muslims are more dogmatic is rather circular in logic. Yeah, the only ones you'll hear from in the first place are the vociferous ones. It's no different than thinking Christianity = opposition to social progress when thousands of churches help relocate Syrian refugees with a 1/1000 of the fanfare of a pastor that opines about gay folk.Cascade Whore wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:06 am This was from an actual European in an argument I was having with him about colonialism and U.S. imperialism/adventurism. It seems like he may have handed me my ass a bit. He does come from the point of view that "muslimification" is a legitimate threat because he sees Muslims as having their religions much more ingrained into their identity compared to Christians. Earlier though he had contradicted himself a bit as saying there had been indigenous white Muslims living in Bosnia for hundreds of years that don't have the same issues. Anyways here's some quotes from this person who does seem to be pretty well versed on the details of the history of the region and the specific mid east conflicts we've over the last 16 years. I'm loath to repost this as it's the same kind of rhetoric whether intentional or not that people like meatgrease will latch onto to justify their racism. Maybe another European can pic apart his points and decide of he's full of shit or not:
I particularly enjoyed towards the end when he said I have "typical right wing attitudes"Are you seriously disputing that globally, Muslims are more dogmatic than Christians? It's a stereotype of Americans that they are insular and you certainly uphold it well. Do you mean the Arab invasion and conquest of the Phoenician Middle East followed by the 800 years of Turkish Ottoman colonialism? Or the 25 years of French and British colonialism tacked on at the end? And don't regurgitate the "Sykes-Picot" argument, so beloved of Islamists. Nearly all non-Islamic nations in the developing world were colonised at one point and most for far longer than any Islamic nation. Yet none have the unique problems of Islamic nations. There is no oil in northern Nigeria, yet Boko Haram have arisen. There is no oil in Indonesia yet Aceh has become an Islamist theocracy. There are no significant oil reserves in Philippines, Yemen, Somalia, Bangladesh, Mali, Egypt, Afghanistan, and many more Islamic nations which all have a high level of Islamist militancy. Venezuela is swimming in oil yet isn't exporting religious terrorists. Only a handful of Muslim-majority nations are amongst the poorest on the planet. Those equally poor and poorer non-Islamic nations are not producing religious terrorism. Besides, poverty does not beget violence. That's a typical right wing attitude for you to have. You seem the type of person who would also say "The Muslim Arab enslavement of black Africans, millions more than the Europeans enslaved, has no effect on Muslim Arab attitudes towards black people in the modern day. Even though the common Arabic word for black person is 'Abd' which literally means slave".
woah woah woah when the fuck did we establish that CW isn't a drug addict, as a matter of fact? While I have no doubt that he's prescribed a cocktail of drugs to keep his heart from exploding because of all those burgers he's always eating, that's doesn't prove he isn't also getting painkillers from his quack doctor, as cripples often wont to do.
Just admit you're fucking doing drugs on the DL, dude. I'm trying to help you, you sonnova bitch. Do you want to join ranks with the dozens of corpse'd out reee posters? The first step is admitting you have a problem.Cascade Whore wrote: In reference to my conversation with this fellow being from another message board, it was actually from YouTube comments which makes it ten times stupider. If meatgrease is right about anything ever I'll gladly stretch my neck out to receive the blade of a wahhabists scimitar.