Page 81 of 91

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:32 pm
by \m/Johnny\m/
Dude... Did you ever see the "Sex" book? Way more hardcore than Gaga.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:34 pm
by a world of no
yes. looked like an italian vogue or something. it wasn't that sex.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:11 pm
by james
Has there been a Lady Gaga sex parody thing yet?

Lady Gonzo? Who's Gaggin' Gaga?

porn this way


fuck do they even do porn parodies of people or is it just entertainment franchises? I never actually watch those things I'm just aware that they churn them out at a manic pace these days

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:30 pm
by Dr Yail Bloor
I bet she could crack walnuts with that thing.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2013 4:17 pm
by \m/Johnny\m/
james wrote:Has there been a Lady Gaga sex parody thing yet?

Lady Gonzo? Who's Gaggin' Gaga?

porn this way


fuck do they even do porn parodies of people or is it just entertainment franchises? I never actually watch those things I'm just aware that they churn them out at a manic pace these days
Poonies, the porn counterpart to Goonies, is still in my top 10 adult films ever... mostly because I used to be in love with Ginger Lynn. The video store I used to frequent in my teens/twenties had a special shelf for the porn parroty movies... there was one called Cum Buttered Corn Holes. To this day I have no idea what that title is in reference to.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:13 am
by nomb
Children of the Corn

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:39 am
by \m/Johnny\m/
:?

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:38 am
by james
\m/Johnny\m/ wrote:there was one called Cum Buttered Corn Holes. To this day I have no idea what that title is in reference to.
Ahhahahah that cant possibly be a parody of anything, right...? Maybe it was just on the wrong shelf?

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:39 am
by james
Also I just realized the entire cast of Goonies was like 8-12 years old, what the fuck kinda movie was that :lol:

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:21 pm
by soiled depends
it was a movie for fudgepackers...

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:02 pm
by \m/Johnny\m/
james wrote:Also I just realized the entire cast of Goonies was like 8-12 years old, what the fuck kinda movie was that :lol:
All I know is Ginger Lynn got her butthole licked by another chick... That was the first time I've ever seen that. I jerked off until blood came out.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:33 pm
by Necrometer
weirdly not in the mood for quoting but I gotta lay some things out

let's compare quality, not quantity (or extremety?), when it comes to the sexual attention whoring. I think I prefer gaga's version, though it's hard to say since madonna's version was offset by 20 years (as is my perception). madonna's seemed to be "HEY SEX LOOK" whereas gaga's approach is more indifferent and liberated like "why would I have covered my ass in the first place?"

Cum Buttered Corn Holes is not too hard to tease apart - they're interested in showing you some assholes plastered with semen and picked a title that marries two descriptive phrases while delivering the out of place "buttered corn" image, which was probably pleasing to some pappy in a porn cubicle somewhere

yeah, james, individual human people have gotten their own parody porn vids - remember Naylin' Paylin' starring Lisa Ann?

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:38 pm
by FVBTVS
gaga's just impressive for not surgery'ing those below average off kilter egg tits of hers and wearing them loud and proud. you go girl..

:twisted: :mastoman:

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 10:56 pm
by Necrometer
definitely agreed but no need to be crass Image


good news, james - welcome to 2011



there's gotta be a better gaga lookalike in pornland than that weirdo

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:14 pm
by Hornie
bland ed wrote:
Necrometer wrote:ahaha




Image

Image
serious man, probably a half hour wasted on just admiring this pic, no wanking even
This is my memory of the end of a hot date. What ass shot there is shows very nice cheeks for pounding. Under the seashells some fair looking tits and below that a cunt with a touch of hair. SADLY I didn't have the stamina for her, but SammySlammer never had complaints. She will now go to mass and confess after being fucked and having sucked cock. Great job jerking us to cum, and now you can take this hot juice. Hornie

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:21 pm
by ghost boner
something seems vaguely off about that hornie post

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:02 pm
by Necrometer
Hmmm... Image

I just learned that she's 5'1" :shock:

obligatory smut for you miscreants....
Image

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:17 pm
by FVBTVS
:mastoman:

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:23 pm
by Necrometer
I really wish I could link you guys to this performance I downloaded... during the song "artpop" she's just slow motion writhing and stalking around the stage barefoot in that same bikini thing from the photo that shut down ed's evening; totally mesmeric

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:42 pm
by Necrometer
oh, here we go:

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:27 pm
by copstache
Image

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:31 pm
by Iron Goldie
Necrometer wrote:I really wish I could link you guys to this performance I downloaded... during the song "artpop" she's just slow motion writhing and stalking around the stage barefoot in that same bikini thing from the photo that shut down ed's evening; totally mesmeric
I think there are links of it up on direct download sites. And it might pop up on Jewtube again, before they take it down.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:38 pm
by Necrometer
:tup:

can't stop hearing ARTPOP in my head today - you were right about that one and Swine being standouts; listening to the rest was a bit of a letdown but I'm glad she's still going pretty strong based on current evidence

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:41 pm
by Iron Goldie
Necrometer wrote::tup:

can't stop hearing ARTPOP in my head today - you were right about that one and Swine being standouts; listening to the rest was a bit of a letdown but I'm glad she's still going pretty strong based on current evidence
Yeah, ARTPOP is awesome. A bit slower and more laid back than her other dance tunes. And I agree, the rest aren't as good as those two, but are still good. The weakest one to me is Jewels and Drugs, but even that is mildly enjoyable.

Re: Lady GaGa

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:30 am
by Necrometer
GOOD NEWS
SPOILERSPOILER_SHOW
Image
and of course there's this goofball...
[img]http://static.nme.com/images/thumbnail/will-gompertz-blog-profile.jpg[/img] wrote:I’ll tell you straight out, this is a classic cover. When you’re listing the 100 best covers of the 21st century, this will be right up there. Typographically it’s an AA+, visually it’s AAA.

Jeff Koons is one of the best artists around: a funny guy who is seriously good. Here he has given us a game of spot-the-art-historical reference. This is Gaga as Venus. Specifically Botticelli’s version in his Birth of Venus (1486), in whose shell she sits and flowing golden locks she echoes.

But she’s taken a few stops along the art historical way. Koons has done to Botticelli’s Venus, what Edouard Manet – the father of modern art – did to Titian’s Venus in his painting Olympia (1863). That is to bring her bang up to date. Manet did it by turning Venus into a hooker; Koons has done it by transforming her into a pop star. In both cases they have done away with the wistful gaze into the middle distance favoured by the renaissance artists, and instead have their modern versions challenging the viewer by staring directly into his eyes. These are not women to be messed with.

He is also making a nod to Andy Warhol, the high priest of Pop Art (with Gaga being the high priestess of Art Pop?). Warhol toyed with art historical references when recasting a pop culture princess as a venerated goddess in Marilyn Diptych (1962), made shorty after Marilyn Monroe died. A Diptych was an ancient hinged tablet or painting that could be used as an altar piece in front of which people would pray. The left side represented the living, the right side the dead. Warhol alluded to this by presenting Marilyn in colour on the left side and in black and white on the right. Now look at the background of the Koons cover of 'Artpop'.

Koons has not left out art references from this century in his post-modern mash up. Gaga’s legs-akimbo pose is taken from Tracey Emin’s I’ve Got It All (2000), in which we see the YBA - legs wide apart - shovelling money into her groin (I’ll leave you to work out the rhyming slang). But Gaga doesn’t have money between her legs; she has a Jeff Koons sculpture, or is it an Anish Kapoor sphere? Either way, it reflects money metaphorically and an image literally: a surrealist mind-game worthy of Dali himself, who happens to be one of Koons’s great heroes.

His shtick is to play with our perceptions of fine art and pop culture: to make the low high and the high low. His Michael Jackson sculpture is one example, as are the pornographic portraits of him and his then wife La Cicciolina, the Italian politician and porn star, making out. The images are gross or amusing depending on your sensibilities at first, and then become darker and more sinister the more you think about them. Koons’s art asks questions about values, taste, capitalism, reality and beauty. They are designed to appeal to our eyes and mess with our soul. His new album cover for Lady Gaga fits that bill.
http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/why- ... ork-of-art

Koons is so fucking useless