Re: secular humanist brony/MRA/PUA/MGTOW thread of fedorae
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:53 pm
i've seen a lot but I wasn't remotely prepared for thisjames wrote:fast forward to 0:46 for true cenobite-level pain
Move along Paulo's boss. Nothing to see here.
https://www.reeelapse.com/
i've seen a lot but I wasn't remotely prepared for thisjames wrote:fast forward to 0:46 for true cenobite-level pain
I would happily chin check all of you, couple of crisp jabs, none of you have any reach.
She has the exact same voice, mannerisms, conversational style and facial expressions as the female-to-male transgender at my work. It's quite alarming if I can speak frankly.Necrometer wrote:
The goal of peacocking is to show that you can handle social pressure by wearing ridiculous clothes. It's what he is doing.
It's the "i just don't care" attitude which makes him attractive.
Why lie and say it's policitally correct and don't take this seriously. It sounds like you are trying to call it something besides wha it is. You clearly have a problem with black people created by God. So you hate God's creation.Necrometer wrote:does it really though
i guess i'll be the first to admit that i cant hate this guy. obviously 50-60% of this video is trash to be thrown away but for the most part he was trying to whittle away at a core concept that sad sacks always miss is that if you don't have some richness in your internal life and some intrinsic reasons for doing what you do then you're just going to be following another playbook. i mean its still pathetic and ruthlessly beating down a tired path of 'being cool' or whatever butNecrometer wrote:ahahahaha his rant at 1:00
you're spot on - the problem with the PUA thinking is not a practical one but a higher-level-thought one; it's pretty air tight on the id+ego levels - it does work but the price of admission is to view the world as a videogame where cheevos = getting your dick wet, every human is merely an AI to manipulate, and there's absolutely no such thing as love or empathy.FVBTVS wrote:i guess i'll be the first to admit that i cant hate this guy. obviously 50-60% of this video is trash to be thrown away but for the most part he was trying to whittle away at a core concept that sad sacks always miss is that if you don't have some richness in your internal life and some intrinsic reasons for doing what you do then you're just going to be following another playbook. i mean its still pathetic and ruthlessly beating down a tired path of 'being cool' or whatever but
lets just systematize all human relations so we can have a youtube channel about everything
even pointing out how wildly calibrated 'pick up' people are is a true thing.
well, Geoff, you've always been a guy who bames on easy mode, right? the PUA guys are trying to bame on ultra-hard mode where they bang the most attractive females (as determined by MAXIM magazine) by whatever means necessary. it's not like there's a long game there - they have just decided that they want to have sex with these women and that's enough motivation to look like a clown and foster a persona dedicated to manipulation and scheming.Pisscubes wrote:I admit to knowing very little about these PUA types in the "movement" but if the entire idea is simply to get down to some fucking... isn't a whole movement a bit overkill? I mean, I'm certainly no Don "Magic" Juan over here, but it's never come to reading a fucking book or starting a group or learning to recite some fucking rules for Christ's sake.
check out the audio book of The GamePisscubes wrote:
As for the PUAs, I guess I better read up on this stuff and figure out what it's all about. Sounds like a colossal waste of time.
We need the next hyper-virulent plague to sterilize all who are infected... then even the survivors would be somewhat fucked.El Hongo Diabolico wrote:I will never not be shocked/amazed by what people do to get a little moist/dick, but then again it's the fucking DNA parasite(s) riding them down the ages and they're helpless with that wetware programming. I was reading Eagleton on Freud last night and the main image I came away with was Freud (even him) utterly horrified/disgusted by human sexuality as well...so it made me feel better.
As for the brony/MRA/PUA/whatever assholes/bitches, they need to be fertilizer...like yesterday. We are really, really overdue for another world war to kill off this entire fucking generation. Let's stop fucking around.
FVBTVS wrote:goth abobo
I'm with you on this one. But the key thing you have to realize is that the first wave of PUA guys were straight-up fucking NERDS. They never played in a band, or spray painted the walls, or anything else discussed in Black Flag songs which often contributes to helping malcontents like ourselves get laid. What they did do was apply their autastic gifts for analyzing data to interpersonal relations, in order to come up with a scientific method for attaining vagina.Pisscubes wrote:I admit to knowing very little about these PUA types in the "movement" but if the entire idea is simply to get down to some fucking... isn't a whole movement a bit overkill? I mean, I'm certainly no Don "Magic" Juan over here, but it's never come to reading a fucking book or starting a group or learning to recite some fucking rules for Christ's sake.
did you?featherboa wrote:check out the audio book of The GamePisscubes wrote:As for the PUAs, I guess I better read up on this stuff and figure out what it's all about. Sounds like a colossal waste of time.
your insight was solid and I don't have any answers or additional insight... basically I think they're theater kids and I am getting a sneaking suspicion that the adamalien fedora guy is gay or bi or a furry or something so he gets some slight sympathy for bearing that cross. in a broader way it's definitely a case of IRL actors that seems to overlap with the PUA circle in that sensestorm shadow wrote:Also: Ross, I feel you should apply your scientific acumen to pursuing the personality type james and I have identified, I feel this may represent a new subcategory of Ass Burgers which I hope to see in the next edition of the DSM.