Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:23 am
by Jerrod
badgevvrecker wrote:they don't take seriously that i've subjectively found NLP techniques to be personally effectively? oh noes! i'm pretty sure you didn't actually read what i wrote last, merely thought you'd found a neat place to post what you thought might be a relevant infographic.
"Truth" is over-rated and generally unachievable in any realistic sense (and i hold "truth" in most peoples perception to be far different than repeatable methodology based upon statistical evidence).
Results, on the other hand, pretty damn useful. as for NLP aka Converstional Hypnosis mixed with Semantic Manipulation: i can achieve results from about 1/4 of the people out there with almost no effort, double that if i've got a few sessions. the "why" of this is of no consequence to me, beyond as a metaphorical framework for manipulation.
but i've never been a fundamentalist materialist, and i'm a pretty big fan of Robert Anton Wilson.
I actually read what you wrote, and it doesn't make sense. I don't care what your definition of truth is, or that you have a personal experience which works just fine for you, but whose results can't be repeated. That's not science.
I'll take a look at the link you posted after work and give you an honest answer to your question.
Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:50 pm
by badgevvrecker
1) never claimed it was science.
2) results are easily repeatable, else i couldn't have been taught. the key here is that humanity is very inconsistent. but a technique that regularly works immediately on 1/4 people is pretty replicable, humans just arent predictable robots yet.
Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:42 pm
by soiled depends
Jerrod wrote:
I'll take a look at the link you posted after work and give you an honest answer to your question.
Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:27 pm
by badgevvrecker
Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:01 pm
by Jerrod
badgevvrecker wrote:
2) results are easily repeatable, else i couldn't have been taught. the key here is that humanity is very inconsistent. but a technique that regularly works immediately on 1/4 people is pretty replicable, humans just arent predictable robots yet.
Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.
Re: tsoukalos and icke: a thread for pop collective delusion
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:24 am
by badgevvrecker
Jerrod wrote:
badgevvrecker wrote:
2) results are easily repeatable, else i couldn't have been taught. the key here is that humanity is very inconsistent. but a technique that regularly works immediately on 1/4 people is pretty replicable, humans just arent predictable robots yet.
Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.
affected fallacy is my strong suit. well, that and clubs.
Logic clearly isn't your strong suit.